Where is the "circular argument" in deducing intelligent design from the presence of organized matter that behaves according to predictable laws?
A good question. For me, at least, it lies in your assumption that because intelligent designers make things that are organized, things that are organized come from an intelligent designer. Besides - you use the word deduced - I thought deduction was a process whereby alternate explanations are falsified. Have you falsified ToE? No, you skipped it entirely (see above). Anyway, happy new year. Hope you have a great one!