Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

---complete fantasy and misinformation---
1 posted on 12/31/2005 7:35:11 AM PST by rellimpank
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last
To: rellimpank

How odd! There was not one mention of the fact that Toronto's gun related killings are almost entirely as a result of Jamaican gang activity. Also not mentioned is that these gangs are the Jamaicans that Canadian liberals imported and have kept dependent on government handouts in order to expand the Canadian liberal voting constituency.


24 posted on 12/31/2005 8:48:11 AM PST by DJ Taylor (Once again our country is at war, and once again the Democrats have sided with our enemy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rellimpank
"The majority of those guns come from over the border," she says. "And the ones that are reported as legally registered in Canada may also be manufactured in the U.S."

...so a hood is a hood no matter where he gets a gun. and it don't matter if the "majority" of guns used in a CRIME came from Bermuda...????...Next this bunch of "Scholars" will be pointing out if the criminal fired the weapon to the north he must have gotten the weapon from the US,and if he fires to the south,it's a clear indication it was purchased or stolen from Alaska

Doogle

25 posted on 12/31/2005 8:48:45 AM PST by Doogle (USAF...8thAF...4077th TFW...408th MMS...Ubon Thailand..."69"..Night Line Delivery,AMMO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rellimpank
the latest Toronto police figures — obtained through a Freedom of Information request — show that 52 per cent of handguns seized as "potential crime weapons" in 2004 came from the United States.

Let me know when they start rounding up potential prostitutes, potential wife beaters, and potential drunk drivers. Then I'll know they're serious about crime.

26 posted on 12/31/2005 8:51:52 AM PST by Steel Wolf (If the Founders had wanted the President to be spying on our phone calls, they would have said so!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rellimpank
"52 people have died from gunfire in the city this year. It's a far lower total than the more than 1,400 killed in New York"

...and so the Canadian MSM gets on the wagon of false and misleading information. If you scoot over to today's New York Times...

http://www.nytimes.com/2005/12/31/nyregion/31crime.html?hp&ex=1136091600&en=10df13f49ff8773a&ei=5094&partner=homepage

...you will see that New York will likely come in at under 550 total murders this year, nothing like 1400, which is probably a very old number (to be comparing apples to apples, one would also have to add people killed in gun accidents to New York's number, but then one would also have to exclude people murdered without the use of guns, which is probably a larger number).

It also needs to be noted that New York is over 3 times as populous as Toronto, and would be expected to have higher crime numbers, even if all other things were equal. When you use the correct numbers, adjusted for population, New York is still several times higher than Canada, but the trend lines have been clearly converging over the past 10 years.

The bottom line is that, with the infusion of, how do you say, people of other cultures, Canada's violent crime rate is starting to soar, and they can try as hard as they want to blame us, but we're too busy getting our house in order down here (certainly in New York) to be concerned with their ranting.
27 posted on 12/31/2005 8:58:29 AM PST by MediaAnalyst
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rellimpank
"Wendy Cukier,"

Appropriate name considering the subject.
29 posted on 12/31/2005 9:17:20 AM PST by yer gonna put yer eye out (For liberals, using large words is an acceptable substitute for logic...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rellimpank
From the article:

and since a series of laws were tightened, murders with rifles and shotguns have plummeted from 131 in 1989 to 32 in 2003.

Interesting statement since the article was almost entirely concerned about handguns, and yet slipped in unnoticed was this statement that murders with rifles and shotguns fell.

31 posted on 12/31/2005 9:38:04 AM PST by VeniVidiVici (What? Me worry?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rellimpank
"potential crime weapons"

Eric Blair would be proud.

33 posted on 12/31/2005 9:56:29 AM PST by George Smiley (This tagline deliberately targeted journalists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rellimpank
"potential crime weapons"

Eric Blair would be proud.

Funny things happen when you mistype HREF.

34 posted on 12/31/2005 9:57:17 AM PST by George Smiley (This tagline deliberately targeted journalists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rellimpank

Canadian anti-gunners are so stupid...that's why they pronounce it CanaDUH!


35 posted on 12/31/2005 4:23:18 PM PST by 2harddrive (...House a TOTAL Loss.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rellimpank

Obviously, we should begin dating things before and after the advent of the gun. Which was yesterday, based on this article.


36 posted on 12/31/2005 4:38:28 PM PST by Simo Hayha (An education is incomplete without instruction in the use of arms to protect oneself from harm.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson