To: nj26
My guess is that the leak came from a Clinton/Powell holdover in the CIA or State Department. Oh really, then why did the original NY DNC Times story specifically refer to Sen Jay Rockefeller's objections to the program despite the fact that Rockerfeller's "letter" specifically bemoans the fact HE CANNOT TALK ABOUT IT to anyone? So HOW does the NY Time know about it if HE CANNOT TALK ABOUT IT?
97 posted on
12/31/2005 6:43:24 AM PST by
MNJohnnie
(We do not create terrorism by fighting the terrorists. We invite terrorism by ignoring them.--GWBush)
To: MNJohnnie
Oh really, then why did the original NY DNC Times story specifically refer to Sen Jay Rockefeller's objections to the program despite the fact that Rockerfeller's "letter" specifically bemoans the fact HE CANNOT TALK ABOUT IT to anyone? There are two possibilities.
1. They just *knew* that Senator Rockefeller would object to this program, and figured they'd just work him into the story without his prior consent.
2. Uh... Hmm. I dunno. How else could they have gotten that information?
107 posted on
12/31/2005 6:52:28 AM PST by
Steel Wolf
(If the Founders had wanted the President to be spying on our phone calls, they would have said so!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson