Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MNJohnnie
Oh really, then why did the original NY DNC Times story specifically refer to Sen Jay Rockefeller's objections to the program despite the fact that Rockerfeller's "letter" specifically bemoans the fact HE CANNOT TALK ABOUT IT to anyone?

There are two possibilities.

1. They just *knew* that Senator Rockefeller would object to this program, and figured they'd just work him into the story without his prior consent.

2. Uh... Hmm. I dunno. How else could they have gotten that information?

107 posted on 12/31/2005 6:52:28 AM PST by Steel Wolf (If the Founders had wanted the President to be spying on our phone calls, they would have said so!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies ]


To: Steel Wolf
Oh really, then why did the original NY DNC Times story specifically refer to Sen Jay Rockefeller's objections to the program despite the fact that Rockerfeller's "letter" specifically bemoans the fact HE CANNOT TALK ABOUT IT to anyone? There are two possibilities.

1. They just *knew* that Senator Rockefeller would object to this program, and figured they'd just work him into the story without his prior consent.

2. Uh... Hmm. I dunno. How else could they have gotten that information

If Rockie is the leaker.

115 posted on 12/31/2005 7:07:40 AM PST by MNJohnnie (We do not create terrorism by fighting the terrorists. We invite terrorism by ignoring them.--GWBush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson