To: ThomasNast
As soon as you take such evidence that DOES point to a composer and claim that must be the answer, then you are violating the premise from the onset that no composer be used to explain the origin of the piece.
At this point your analogy falls apart, as science has no such assumption when invesitgating the origins of either life or the cosmos.
36 posted on
12/30/2005 4:01:20 PM PST by
Dimensio
(http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
To: Dimensio
At this point your analogy falls apart, as science has no such assumption when invesitgating the origins of either life or the cosmos. Maybe science doesn't, but Evolutionist sure do. Of course, we don't want to confuse the two.
If science can't deal with the possibility of a creator, then possibly it is science which is lacking. Maybe science needs to pull it's collective head out of its ar$e, and smell the coffee.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson