Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ThomasNast
As soon as you take such evidence that DOES point to a composer and claim that must be the answer, then you are violating the premise from the onset that no composer be used to explain the origin of the piece.

At this point your analogy falls apart, as science has no such assumption when invesitgating the origins of either life or the cosmos.
36 posted on 12/30/2005 4:01:20 PM PST by Dimensio (http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]


To: Dimensio
At this point your analogy falls apart, as science has no such assumption when invesitgating the origins of either life or the cosmos.

Maybe science doesn't, but Evolutionist sure do. Of course, we don't want to confuse the two.

If science can't deal with the possibility of a creator, then possibly it is science which is lacking. Maybe science needs to pull it's collective head out of its ar$e, and smell the coffee.

177 posted on 12/31/2005 9:49:48 PM PST by GSHastings
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson