[GSHastings]

At this point your analogy falls apart, as science has no such assumption when invesitgating the origins of either life or the cosmos.

Maybe science doesn't, but Evolutionist sure do. Of course, we don't want to confuse the two.

If science can't deal with the possibility of a creator, then possibly it is science which is lacking. Maybe science needs to pull it's collective head out of its ar$e, and smell the coffee.

[Dimensio]

Maybe science doesn't, but Evolutionist sure do.

No, they don't. You're mistaking "not finding any evidence for a creator whatsoever" with "assuming that there is no creator".