I am pointing out that to be scientific does NOT necessarily mean you start with eliminating some possibilities.
When Newton studied science, he believed he was studying God's universe (granted -- that IS a bias).
But if God did create the universe, not allowing that as a possibilty is automatically eliminating the truth.
That's what the analogy is stating. If you eliminate the idea of a composer so you can perform a study on purely scientific merits, you will not come up with the right answer.
Yes, eliminating possible alternative explanations beforehand is wrong.
That's why I know you'll agree with me that the "MARTIANS-ACTUALLY-CREATED-US" theory must be taught as well, along with Evolution and Intelligent Design.
After all, there's no way to disprove it, so it's just as valid as well, right?