Posted on 12/30/2005 2:29:22 PM PST by PatrickHenry
As a true pioneer of the alternatives to evolutionary theory, Dr. A.E. Wilder-Smith fearlessly confronted the seemingly all-powerful theory of evolution in universities and churches all over the world.
http://www.wildersmith.org/library.htm
Creationist, Chemist, & Lecturer
Ph.D. in physical organic chemistry at University of Reading, England (1941)
Dr.es.Sc. in pharmacological sciences from Eidgenossische Technische Hochschule (Swiss Federal Institute of Technology) in Zurich
D.Sc. in pharmacological sciences from University of Geneva (1964)
F.R.I.C. (Fellow of the Royal Institute of Chemistry) Professorships held at numerous institutions including:
University of Illinois Medical School Center (Visiting Full Professor of Pharmacology,
1959-61, received 3 "Golden Apple" awards for the best course of lectures),
University of Geneva School of Medicine,
University of Bergen (Norway) School of Medicine,
Hacettepe University (Ankara, Turkey) Medical School, etc.
Former Director of Research for a Swiss pharmaceutical company
Presented the 1986 Huxley Memorial Lecture at the invitation of the University of Oxford
Author or co-author of over 70 scientific publications and more than 30 books published in 17 languages
NATO three-star general
Deceased
Dr. Wilder-Smith was featured in an award-winning film and video series called ORIGINS: How the World Came to Be
http://media.trinetcom.com/media/ff4c/wildersmith/OAW0503.mp3
I went to that link, Eugenie Scott was cited??
She is the most biased ignoramus that was totally humiliated by Forest Mimms, and I still have that on video somewhere,
they were both on Crossfire, She kept saying how she never heard of him, while he replied he never heard of her, either and how many books has she authored, she said none, he had at the time 9 or so and was even scientific enough to get selected fo Scientific American until their biased editors fired him for (GASP) being a Bible Believing Christian!! (ie: he believed the Bible more than he believed the false science of Evolution...)
Keep in mind that you're dealing with someone who is either so irrational or so dishonest that he actually tried to claim that Issac Newton being a creationist is somehow proof that creationism is correct.
Keep in mind that you're dealing with someone who is either so irrational or so dishonest that he actually tried to claim that Issac Newton being a creationist is somehow proof that creationism is correct.
Actual quote from post # 15 below:
When Newton studied science, he believed he was studying God's universe (granted -- that IS a bias).
Please note the acknowledgement that he studied with a bias. Does the phrase "he believed he was studying God's universe" translate in your mind as "Therefore that is proof that creationism is correct"?
Or perhaps the phrase "he believed he was studying God's universe" indicate to you that I am "either so irrational or so dishonest."
I was referring to RaceBannon, not you.
Actual quote from post # 15 below:
When Newton studied science, he believed he was studying God's universe (granted -- that IS a bias).
How in the WORLD did someone colclude that the above quote is claiming that this is PROOF of creationism? It is a statement of Newton's beliefs. How could such a statement be possibly misinterpreted?
I did not see his reference to Newton.
I'll check it out.
Apologies.
Dont worry, Newton has printed many things concerning his faith, I have read some of them.
Demensio is just grasping at straws to defend his non-science.
How is it that when creationists and ID advocates are listing scientific frauds, they never list the midwife toad?
And I'm still waiting to hear from Race as to whether he agrees with Behe, Denton and Dembski that common descent is a fact.
Thanks.
I'll help if I can, just f-mail me.
Nope. It pretty much does away with the need for ID.
It's amaxing too that he has been posting this same crap since at least 1999 here:
http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a37d00a8465b5.htm
I am assuming he is the author, James E. Bancroft.
And the stratification of those fossils is due to what?
I concur fully with CG's assessment of Racebannon's bag of previously demonstrated lies, evasions, canards, and misrepresentations. Do you still think that Race' should get a free pass on the need to be honest because he is "a marine and a fine American".
I was actually wrong. The first post was in 1999. :)
Since there is no pure definite stratification of fossils worldwide, what did you ask again?
That's a deliberate lie, I shied away from nothing
proving evolutionists lie again, just like Piltdown...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.