Keep in mind that you're dealing with someone who is either so irrational or so dishonest that he actually tried to claim that Issac Newton being a creationist is somehow proof that creationism is correct.
Actual quote from post # 15 below:
When Newton studied science, he believed he was studying God's universe (granted -- that IS a bias).
Please note the acknowledgement that he studied with a bias. Does the phrase "he believed he was studying God's universe" translate in your mind as "Therefore that is proof that creationism is correct"?
Or perhaps the phrase "he believed he was studying God's universe" indicate to you that I am "either so irrational or so dishonest."
I was referring to RaceBannon, not you.
Actual quote from post # 15 below:
When Newton studied science, he believed he was studying God's universe (granted -- that IS a bias).
How in the WORLD did someone colclude that the above quote is claiming that this is PROOF of creationism? It is a statement of Newton's beliefs. How could such a statement be possibly misinterpreted?