To: RightWingAtheist
Is it true that this Court also ruled that instructors are forbidden to question, criticize or challenge evolution theory? There can be no possible justification for such an imperious command.
"Evolution is a theory in the scientific sense. It has been tested repeatedly by examining the remains of now-extinct creatures to see how one species has emerged to replace another." He calls that "testing"?
"But if an intelligent designer had created the human eye, He (or She) made some big mistakes."There's no arrogance like those who think they are smarter than God.
4 posted on
12/30/2005 9:20:12 AM PST by
BenLurkin
(O beautiful for patriot dream - that sees beyond the years)
To: BenLurkin
Is it true that this Court also ruled that instructors are forbidden to question, criticize or challenge evolution theory?
No.
45 posted on
12/30/2005 12:10:04 PM PST by
Dimensio
(http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
To: BenLurkin
Is it true that this Court also ruled that instructors are forbidden to question, criticize or challenge evolution theory? No, it isn't.
There can be no possible justification for such an imperious command.
That's why he didn't make one.
Why don't you try reading the decision for yourself? It has a lot of good material in it.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson