Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dog Gone; Eric in the Ozarks
The question Edison had to ask itself is whether making a $1.1 billion investment was going to make a satisfactory rate of return.

The plant's already been running for 34 years, so can't have too much of a life left in it. That $1.1 billion (for a plant that cost $214 million to build, still less than a billion in today's dollars) won't be spread out over too-long a time, maybe only 10 or 20 years.

36 posted on 12/30/2005 9:32:52 AM PST by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]


To: antiRepublicrat
The plant's already been running for 34 years, so can't have too much of a life left in it.

What is your estimate of lifespan of a 1500 mw powerplant? Bear in mind boilers can be re-tubed, turbines rebuilt and auxillary equipment replaced. Longevity estimates are sometimes made for bond issues, regulators or other single issue bodies. These estimates may have no real basis.

42 posted on 12/30/2005 11:31:00 AM PST by BipolarBob (Yes I backed over the vampire, but I swear I looked in my rearview mirror.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson