Here, at last, are the true victims of 9/11

Canada Free Press ^ | Thursday, December 29, 2005 | John Burtis

[Anne_Conn]

Hush, now, The New York Times has just announced that the attorneys representing terror suspects hailing from Oregon, Florida, Virginia, and Ohio will now challenge, or sue or whatever, the President of the United States over his use of the NSA to monitor their clients' conversations. Clients who are, according to the Times' own story, tied to al-Qaeda. The Times then goes on to question why these particular men might have been "singled out." More,,,

[SittinYonder]

These stories, the numerous charges and firings for plagiarism, and stories made up from whole cloth alone tell you who runs the paper and why.

Only someone locked away in a closet for the last 60 years would believe that the New York Times ranks above the Weekly World News (with this week's cover announcing "Abominable Beachman Strikes Terror in Hawaii") in terms of accuracy and truth in reporting.

The New York Times is a joke, and we all know it.

[rightwingintelligentsia]

Who is running the paper? The same guys that brought the story that claimed John Roberts wrote the notoriously anti-Semitic screed, The Protocols of the Elders of Zion, while employed at the Reagan White House.

Did the NYT actually publish that? How could I have missed it?

[God luvs America]

bump

[Brad from Tennessee]

I wrote a letters to the New York Times but I know it's useless:
12-27

Editor:

After reading the latest installment (12-28-05) of James Risen's series, one might ask: Why not just load up a Kalashnikov and shoot pedestrians from the newsroom windows?

Brad (last name)

[kitkat]

***The New York Times is a joke, and we all know it.***

It's far more than a joke. It's so totally tied up with the Democrats that it will do ANYTHING to bring down our President, and place the lives of every one of us in jeopardy. I suspect that the decision makers of the NY Times are playing Russian roulette. If NY city is hit again, they lose. If it's San Francisco, Chicago, L.A., etc., then they blame it on Bush, capture the presidency, and get perks from the new communist government.

[cvq3842]

I hate to bring politics into this, but it's possible that all the Dems and the Tokyo Rose left have done with these national security revelations is demonstrate that they would NOT use the constitutionally available powers to protect us and insulate Bush from the worst criticism if there is another attack.

[antiRepublicrat]

On this issue, I've always stressed that the government shouldn't be allowed to do things of questionable constitutionality because of our rights. This is an angle I didn't think of -- they give an excuse to the guilty to have their convictions overturned.