Posted on 12/29/2005 12:18:51 AM PST by Wiz
Recent tests of the Rotorcraft External Airbag Protection System (REAPS) developed by RAFAEL verified the crash protection capabilities of the system, mitigating crash loads below 25 g, thereby opening the way for future military and commercial applications. Following the November 2005 tests, which concluded a two year US Navy Concept and Technology Demonstration program RAFAEL plans to get FAA certification for passenger helicopter application.
REAPS uses a external airbag array, attached under the fuselage of passenger rotorcrafts. The system uses proximity sensors to measure the ground approach deploy the airbag just before an imminent crash, thereby limiting passenger injuries and airframe damage. REAPS moderates the crash impact loadings with hard or soft surface (including water impact).
The tests took place near Phoenix, AZ on Bell 206 rotorcrafts. Two drops were conducted at a maximum gross weight of 3300 lbs, at impact velocities of 27 and 34 ft/sec (1,600 and 2,000 ft/min). The helicopters were equipped with four ATD's (Anthropomorphic Test Dummies) simulating human passengers. The "passengers" were in tact after each drop. In addition the tests proved that due to the REAPS airbags, the passengers were subjected to an impact of less than 25G with absolutely no rebound and secondary impact. As for the helicopters, according to Mr. Ken Bennett, a helicopter specialist at HeliWorks, Pensacola FL, who participated in the tests as part of the survivability evaluation team, both helicopters were in a repairable state following impact. and the airframe experienced limited damage.
(Excerpt) Read more at defense-update.com ...
This concept was advanced and discarded in the early 1970's by Bell Helicopter, Ft. Worth, Texas. I know because I worked on it!
Several concepts were proposed for the AH-1G Cobra gunship specifically. One, rotors were blown and the 'chutes (3 or so) deployed to lower the airframe safely. Problem was that most helicopter operations were far too close to the ground for 'chutes to have time to become effective before catastrophic impact. Secondly, the rotors were blown and occupants were ejected out the top like the ejection seats we have all seen in military jets for a long time. Problem was - pilots simply would not trust it! Again, too, time before airframe terrain impact was very, very short because of operational altitudes.
I believe the article was in an old Popular Mechanics mag I read in a Dr.s office. The working altitude issue makes sense but I wish there was someway to increase survivability.
I'm just an old VN era vet that remembers alot of crash and burns. My dreams of becoming a chopper pilot were dashed when I chose the air force over army aviation - I remember that being married and life expectancy had impacts on my decision.
Best,
mc
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.