To: b_sharp; johnnyb_61820
Lamark was put to rest a long time ago, deservedly so. I followed the thread back quite a way for the reference to E. coli. Environmental factors can trigger latent genes, such as UV light triggering a lysogenic phage to become lytic (lambda). This happens in humans too with UV (sunlight) triggering cold sore viruses, but the genetic information is already in the genome and is not acquired from the environment or because of the environment.
The closest stuff is the possibility of directed mutation as described by Cairns and Hall, using an IS in bacteria. Unfortunately these experiments are currently under a cloud because starvation of the cells, which was used as a selective pressure, induces IS excision. I haven't seen anything new in this area since 1998 so it may be dead.
Behavior can be learned and acquired, but genetic traits have to be in the germ line to be passed on.
936 posted on
12/30/2005 7:07:18 PM PST by
furball4paws
(The new elixir of life - dehydrated toad urine.)
To: furball4paws
Thank you for the update sir.
937 posted on
12/30/2005 7:15:14 PM PST by
b_sharp
(Science adjusts theories to fit evidence, creationism distorts evidence to fit the Bible.)
To: furball4paws
Behavior can be learned and acquired, but genetic traits have to be in the germ line to be passed on. Sigh. You mean acquired characteristics like genetic mutations from radiation or various toxins (think mustard gas, it can affect the DNA, I've read) cannot be passed on?
Darn it.
1,003 posted on
12/31/2005 12:54:24 AM PST by
grey_whiskers
(The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
To: furball4paws
Behavior can be learned and acquired, but genetic traits have to be in the germ line to be passed on. Hi furball, thanks for your earlier freepmail about the hemoglobin. This weekend I may actually have time to READ it...!
With your permission, I'd like to Freepmail you again about that and 1 or 2 other points.
Cheers!
1,004 posted on
12/31/2005 12:58:19 AM PST by
grey_whiskers
(The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
To: furball4paws
"Environmental factors can trigger latent genes ... but the genetic information is already in the genome and is not acquired from the environment or because of the environment."
This is the creationist model of genomic change. It is quite Lamarckian -- the response was pre-coded into the genome, but it was itself a genomic (not just a phenotypic) change.
"I haven't seen anything new in this area since 1998 so it may be dead."
There's still work being done. See for example:
http://www.genetics.org/cgi/content/full/156/2/477
and also:
http://www.jbc.org/cgi/content/full/276/8/5700
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson