Darwinists also do extrapolation. That is where the statemets of faith are. When they predict what will be shown in the future.
The Apostle Paul defined faith as the hope of things not seen. That is exactly what their statements of what will be shown at some time in the future are.
They are their prophecys. There is nothing wrong in believing prophecys. I do that.
That they choose to call them by another name is similar to the "a rose by any other name would smell as sweet".
They believed Darwins predictions or prophceys when he had no scientific evidence to support them. They see that some of his prophecies turned out to be correct, so they extrapolate that all will be proven in time.
Some more may be proven, but in the meantime they are using their political muscle to enforce their doctrine.
My request is just that they call a spade a spade and admit that they have faith in their Prophet. --- faith that he will be proven right in the end.
Likewise...
"A rose by any other name would be called something else"