The astute reader will notice that several times in that post, I stated that these processes have been observed occurring in nature, and that there is abundant evidence for them. If connectthedots wants to challenge that assertion, he's welcome to do so (and in reply I'll be glad to post enough primary citations to choke a horse), but it's just childish of him to pretend that what I posted was just "nothing more than speculation" on my part.
Or maybe he didn't even bother to read it before hand-waving it away. That would be consistent with his past behavior.
In any case, his failure to deal with the facts, and his obstinate and pointless naysaying as a substitute for dealing with the subject matter, should be entirely obvious to all by now.
A moderately astute observer would also notice that there was no evidence even claimed that there has been any observation of a species of one classification evolving into a species of another classification.
Adaptation/micro-evolution is quite different from macro-evolution.
If macro-evolution had ever been observed, there would be no evolution v. ID/creation debate; would there? Iknow of no evolutionist who has claimed that macro-evolution has been observed. All they do is speculate that it has happened.