You have already been schooled, and by those much better at doing so than me, on why your comparison is false.
If you HAD to determine why a transistor worked, science provides tools to make that determination. You know that there is a scientific, physical underlying priciple for how a transistor works. It is not just "faith." It is knowledge (unless you want to go down the "if Helen Keller falls in a forest, does she make a sound" road).
Faith provides no such investigatory tools. It just ends with {poof}.
Even the discussion about what is "faith" and what is "known" is philisophical, not scientific.
Again, is it impossible for you to stay on topic?
Ok maybe I should inquire as to how you believe species came and went and later another started.
It is OK if you cite someone else as the basis for your belief. Just don't tell me that the fossil record shows it happening, or that there was a gradual incremental change that made it happen.
It has not been shown by anyone how this happens.