You misunderstand, I beleive that evolution takes place.
When the statement that someone knows that all the principles of evolutionary theory have been shown, they are making a leap of faith.
Nobody has shown how one species becomes another. That it takes place may be shown someday just as the evolutionist prophets have said. To beleive they are writing the truth is a demonstration of faith in their teachings.
As I stated, it would be bigoted to deny them their faith. As an excercise, show a link to a "peer reviewed" article which proves how mastadons became elephants or how manitees became elephants. They are said to be on the same branch.
As I have stated, it is not wrong to use statements of faith to explain things that have not been proven. It is just misleading to represent statements of faith as science.
"Of COURSE not!", says EvoDude, "For this would be that PUNK EEK stuff that all (well, MOST) of us Evo's have discounted already. That's like a MIRACLE er sumpthin'!"
(Note:Specie A takes MANY small changes to get to Specie B, none of which manage to get 'preserved'.)