Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jbloedow
... but when we see natural phenomena best explained through divine creation, we accept that as the best model.

Goddidit is not an explanation. Never has been, although it has been attempted for every phenomenon from disease to earthquakes.

1,056 posted on 12/31/2005 7:15:52 AM PST by js1138 (Great is the power of steady misrepresentation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 954 | View Replies ]


To: js1138
Goddidit is not an explanation. Never has been, although it has been attempted for every phenomenon from disease to earthquakes.

OK, we're dangerously close to chasing our rhetorical tail here... If you follow the (sub)thread, Coyote was willing to allow "Goddidit(TM)" as an explanation for abiogenesis, because as you and he and who knows who else who all read the same pamphlet from the American Humanist Association all said, you guys don't care what the theory of the origin of life is. It doesn't matter. But now it sounds like it does (as I claimed you would). I'm so confused...

1,061 posted on 12/31/2005 7:23:47 AM PST by jbloedow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1056 | View Replies ]

To: js1138
Never has been...

In your mind; will it EVER be?

1,121 posted on 12/31/2005 1:26:28 PM PST by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1056 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson