Are the facts correct is one thing I would ask? Is gun confiscation strictly a liberal plan or mindset? Who else would want to confiscate guns? How would gun confiscation be administered?
I think banning guns means more than restrictions on sales of guns and more than gun registration, it must mean going door to door and confiscating the weapons.
At least the victims can know that they were "safely" murdered.
Indeed. Those want to violate murder statutes would of course be compelled to obey laws banning handguns.
Shew. Some people are just beyond stupid.
Jenny Price appears to be an LA based writer. I found this list of articles where she is credited with writing an anti-gun article in 1998, apparently two years before this alleged tragedy;
http://www.vpc.org/studies/wgun980324.htm
Gun control is a totalitarian mindset. Anyone who wants to rule a people by force, first needs to remove from the people the ability to defend themselves. This was true in feudal societies. It was true in Nazi Germany and the USSR. It's still true in Africa, NK, China, and the Fourth Reich European Union. Either defend your right to keep and bear arms in order to protect yourself, or just put your chains on and obey.
Where's the author's source for this stat? Or is it the "87% of all Statistics are made up on the spot" type?
|
Being a liberal allows them to live a life of idle privilege while continuing to feel good about themselves. Doing anything substantive to fix things would require repudiating Utopianism and acknowledging the disastrous results of everything the left has done since FDR.
Its so much easier to just blame everything on guns. Sitting in a cottage in the Hamptons or a tony San Francisco loft they can say "I am doing something about violence!" without the pesky need to do any heavy lifting - or painful self examination.
What would happen to those millions if they didn't have those guns? Would they be victims of axe murders? Machetes? Rapists with nothing more than chloroform and duct tape?
No thanks. You try and take my guns and you'll be the next "victim" on this idiot writers list...
Poor Jenny Price's brother was murdered so it's only fair that the rest of us be disarmed so we can share her brother's fate.
Why dont they just say the only way to stop hand gun crime is to CONFISCATE hand guns?
"These guns are designed to kill people: That's their sole purpose."
Is she RETARDED????????????
If guns kill people, then eating organic foods makes liberals stupid.
It's people who commit crimes. If they had no guns, they would use knives, planks of wood, bricks, glass bottles, etc. like they do throughout Europe.
A vote for gun control=A vote to help criminals commit crimes.
Total idiot. She blames a gun for killing her brother, yet does not even mention the criminal.
You mean something kind of like what was done in Louisiana a few weeks ago? Right after a publicly elected official's lackey sheriff stated ONLY THE POLICE SHALL BE ARMED?
You mean something like what happened in Cuba right after Castro took power?
You mean something like happened in the USSR and in Nazi Germany and in every other freakin' police state since the dawn of time???
"Are the facts correct is one thing I would ask?"
I doubt it.
"Is gun confiscation strictly a liberal plan or mindset? "
Mainly, but not entirely. No liberal I know approves of guns, but there are a few conservatives out there who are also anti-gun.
"Who else would want to confiscate guns?"
Super law and order types with no real experience in police work.
"How would gun confiscation be administered? "
The way they are doing it now - incrementally. FIRST you start in school with young kds. You brainwash them into thinking Guns = bad. Then you pass sturpid restricting laws against "assault rifles", "Saturday Night Specials" ".50 caliber Sniper rifles", etc. Then you require registration of guns on the state level or permitting on the state level. That way, they know who has what and where to go to get it.
You also pass idiotic restrictions like trigger lock laws, and "smart-gun" bills.
Eventually, the law-abiding citizens are gradually convinced they are saer by giving up guns and gradually the criminal element becomes bolder and gets its hands on more and more illegal smuggled guns.
Then you have what exists today in England and other places which tried this nonesense.
They'd hit you in the wallet.
From the millions licensed to carry handguns the far left is able to find one whacko and uses that story, which may or may not be true, as a way to get traction for its usual aray of bankrupt agruements.