Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dow slumps triple digits as Treasury yield curve inverts (recession indicator)
MarketWatch.com (by Dow Jones) ^ | 12/27/05 | Tomi Kilgore

Posted on 12/27/2005 1:36:38 PM PST by SierraWasp

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-136 next last
To: tubebender; Dog Gone
Oh my... Those FRustrated FReepers!!! Ha Ha Ha!!!

Here tis, Dog Gone! I fergot ta Ping ya!!!

41 posted on 12/27/2005 2:48:10 PM PST by SierraWasp (EnvironMentalism... America's establishment of it's new unconstitutional State Religion!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: SierraWasp
the only time in the last 30 years that an inverted yield curve wasn't followed by a recession was in 1998, when the curve inverted briefly during the Asian financial crisis.

That is objectively false. There was no recession in 1988.

42 posted on 12/27/2005 2:52:40 PM PST by SolidSupplySide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SierraWasp
..the only time in the last 30 years that an inverted yield curve wasn't followed by a recession was in 1998, when the curve inverted briefly during the Asian financial crisis.

In the last 30 years, the yield curve has had to invert by two percentage points or more for a recession to occur. I haven't seen anyone predicting that kind of inversion as yet.

43 posted on 12/27/2005 2:55:56 PM PST by Mase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SolidSupplySide
"There was no recession in 1988."

The article didn't say "1988!" It said 1998!!!

44 posted on 12/27/2005 2:57:58 PM PST by SierraWasp (EnvironMentalism... America's establishment of it's new unconstitutional State Religion!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Grendel9

and paying off Santa...


45 posted on 12/27/2005 2:58:00 PM PST by demkicker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: dubyaismypresident

"If they hadn't overreached in their raising of short term rates, there wouldn't be a yield curve inversion."

I hate it when the yield curve inverts.


46 posted on 12/27/2005 2:58:21 PM PST by EQAndyBuzz (Liberal Talking Point - Bush = Hitler ... Republican Talking Point - Let the Liberals Talk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SierraWasp
The article didn't say "1988!" It said 1998!!!

I assert that there was an inverted yield curve in December 1988, and no recession. The article says that 1998 was the only time that there was inversion with no recession. I say that isn't true.

47 posted on 12/27/2005 2:59:57 PM PST by SolidSupplySide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Mase
In the last 30 years, the yield curve has had to invert by two percentage points or more for a recession to occur.

The last time we had inversion by two percentage points or more was 1980.

48 posted on 12/27/2005 3:01:03 PM PST by SolidSupplySide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: mhx

They are about done raising rates. The power range is 2-5%, which is where they are. If the economy turns south, there is room to lower rates for a couple years. But, it is time for mortgage lenders to start making some money.


49 posted on 12/27/2005 3:01:32 PM PST by RightWhale (pas de lieu, Rhone que nous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: EQAndyBuzz
I hate it when the yield curve inverts.

You were in a 4G, inverted dive with a Mig-28?

Yes ma'am.

*cough* bullsh*t! *cough*

50 posted on 12/27/2005 3:06:14 PM PST by xrp (My current list of worshippers: MNJohnnie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Mase
That sounds good. I have a hard time puttin my faith in some of these "technical indicators" since the market is so heavily weighted with emotionalism and so many new and uninitiated investors these days!!!

Some of these are just turning into old liberal Democrat wives tales, I think.

51 posted on 12/27/2005 3:06:37 PM PST by SierraWasp (EnvironMentalism... America's establishment of it's new unconstitutional State Religion!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: xcamel; Carling; dubyaismypresident; SierraWasp; q_an_a; theDentist
Not a single Bear on the board...

And most if not all of you 'blamed' the selling on 'tax loss', 'profit taking', 'bond markets'....etc etc etc...Anything but the stocks themselves...

All Bulls and one Bear (Me)....

I feel even better about my Cash, and Net Short Position...he eh...

When you guys are saying 'this market sucks', 'I think I will short some stock', 'I am going to get some more Puts'...I know it will be time to reverse...

52 posted on 12/27/2005 3:06:41 PM PST by antaresequity ((PUSH 1 FOR ENGLISH, PUSH 2 TO BE DEPORTED))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Attention Surplus Disorder

I think the $3K limit on capital losses/yr doesn't apply.

That's the one I forgot about. I've had 400 ins and outs this year and I have to find a CPA or tax consultant who knows daytraders, swing traders, so I can get this mark to market for next year. The guy I had do them last year didn't even mention them. Later I heard about it in an investor's chat room. Thanks for the info. I'll go read the IRS bulletin so I can get really informed! sarc extremely on.


53 posted on 12/27/2005 3:07:18 PM PST by jwh_Denver (New Year's Resolution #1. Try to cut to half those looks my wife gives me. .....punt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: SierraWasp
ARRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRGHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!
54 posted on 12/27/2005 3:08:02 PM PST by Cyber Liberty (© 2005, Ravin' Lunatic since 4/98)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SolidSupplySide

Oh! I see!! I apologize for misunderstanding what I thought was your typo!!!


55 posted on 12/27/2005 3:08:17 PM PST by SierraWasp (EnvironMentalism... America's establishment of it's new unconstitutional State Religion!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: SierraWasp
View the chart posted on my # 106 and read my # 99 on this thread. The treasury yield curve is not inverted. The curve is flat for the first time in five years. But it may be inverted early next month. An inverted yield curve is only one sign of recession. The are some others that the MSM have not focused on yet. Watch the news very closely. Over 800,000 real estate related jobs are at risk; if they are lost when the real estate bubble collapses, watch out. The bubble just popped in Boston.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1547701/posts?page=106#106

56 posted on 12/27/2005 3:12:26 PM PST by ex-Texan (Mathew 7:1 through 6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SierraWasp

Where are those guys who were predicting 11000 a few weeks ago - Their wind done gone.


57 posted on 12/27/2005 3:13:03 PM PST by ex-snook (God of the Universe, God of Creation, God of Love, thank you for life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SolidSupplySide
The last time we had inversion by two percentage points or more was 1980.

I pulled that number from an article from the WSJ today. Do you know what the amount of inversion was during 1991-92?

58 posted on 12/27/2005 3:14:52 PM PST by Mase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: SierraWasp

High demand for longer term bonds (particularly by foreigners) reduces yields.
Government using more short term borrowing.
Very strong economy, low inflation.
Inversion not a big deal.


59 posted on 12/27/2005 3:16:28 PM PST by pleikumud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SolidSupplySide
It has to be inverted for more than a few days and by more than just a few hundredths of a point. I believe 7 out of the last 8 recessions have been preceded by an inverted yield curve. It's a great indicator because it shows how out of control and determined the Federal Reserve is to cause a recession.
60 posted on 12/27/2005 3:16:51 PM PST by Moonman62 (Federal creed: If it moves tax it. If it keeps moving regulate it. If it stops moving subsidize it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-136 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson