Replies

Maybe you need to explain yourself more clearly because you're not making logical sense. Your argument seems to be that "Magician's Nephew" belongs first because the events in it happen chronologically before the events in "The Lion..."

I already explained it twice in the last hour. You're arguing that the book of Genesis should be the second to last book of the Bible. I'm saying that's incorrect, or is this conversation too hard to follow? If it is, I won't bother wasting more time trying to debate with an intellectual lightweight.

I think most people can see who is and isn't an "intellectual lightweight" in this conversation.

I've explained myself very clearly and politely. You're the one who appears quite confused and unable to express himself clearly.

You're arguing that the book of Genesis should be the second to last book of the Bible.

When did I say that? Narnia is not the Bible.

Once again, slowly...

Star Wars is a story. It is not presented chronologically.You stated "Star Wars is in the right order. [non-chronological]. I don't have an issue with that."

Narnia is also a story. It also was not written chronologically. Yet you seem to have a huge problem with the original, non-chronological order of Narnia, likening it to making the book of Genesis the second to last book of the Bible, whereas you have no similar argument regarding Star Wars.

Please explain your glaring inconsistencies and logical fallacies, if you can.