Posted on 12/27/2005 6:20:46 AM PST by hubbubhubbub
Over the past few days, December 21st — when our first Hindenburg Omen (of whatever cluster is coming) — and Thursday December 22nd, the Federal Reserve has conducted one of the largest two-day Repo injections of money into the system since back in September 2001. On Wednesday they added $18.0 billion in reserves and on Thursday they added another $20.0 billion. Is this a coincidence, coming right as we get another Hindenburg Omen? Probably not. Is something high-risk going on behind the scenes here? Let’s review some facts at the Fed. On November 10th, 2005, shortly after appointing Bernanke to replace Greenbackspan, the Fed mysteriously announced with little comment and no palatable justification that they will hide M-3 effective March 2006. M-3 has been the main staple of money supply measurement and transparent disclosure since the Fed was founded back in 1913. It is the key monetary aggregate that includes Fed Repo transactions, that mechanism whereby the Fed increases reserves. The date when M-3 will start being hidden also happens to be the exact month that Iran will declare economic war against the U.S. Dollar by trading its oil in Petro-Euros on its new bourse. But there is more. The Federal Reserve currently has three vacancies within the 19 top Regional Bank and Board of Governor spots. Why? Part of ongoing wholesale resignations.
The latest is from the Philly Fed. Fed President and Open Market Committee member Anthony Santomero has announced his resignation after only a brief year and a half tenure. Very unusual. Hey, Fed Presidents are treated like gods. They have enormous power, prestige, and presence. Why quit? He is far from alone. Over the past few years no less than six Federal Reserve Regional Bank Presidents have resigned. This is highly unusual.
An immediate impact is that we are about to have a largely inexperienced batch of individuals conducting monetary policy in the United States. So of course, the first thing they will do is hide the key money figures. Two positions for the Board of Governors (there are 7)have been open for quite a while. Plus six of the 12 Regional Head spots have turned over during the past few years.
If a substantial amount of oil transactions will suddenly be conducted in Euros instead of Dollars, this should put pressure on the Dollar as folks exchange Dollars for Euros, jeopardizing the Dollar’s status as the world's reserve currency, making it more difficult to print all the dollars the Fed wants to without driving the Dollar into the ground. Iraq threatened to do what Iran has threatened to do just before we went in looking for weapons of mass disappearance. If the Dollar tanks, Treasuries might not be far behind. If Treasuries tank, kiss the Housing-driven boom goodbye. Could the Master Planners be hiding M-3 because they anticipate they may have to monetize the Federal debt, buy our own Treasury Bonds during the coming economic attack against the Dollar? That would require a ton of new fresh money creation — too much to disclose. Could it be some folks at the top of the Fed do not have the stomach to be part of what is about to go down?
M-3 has a direct but lagging impact on financial markets. Look at the chart. Whenever M-3 rises, the Dow Industrials rise. Whenever M-3 is flat or declines, the Dow Industrials decline. The Dow Industrials are a bellwether for the economy. If we can monitor M-3, we can better monitor the future path of equities and the economy. It is wrong for the Fed to stop its disclosure for this very reason. Investors need to know in a free market economy, because M-3 infusion is centrally planned intervention into a free market system. Investors need to know when the Master Planners have decided to intervene. Our buy/sell signals were designed to pick up the scent of Master Planner intervention by analyzing supply and demand forces underlying the markets. So with or without a fully disclosed M-3, we will be able to continue to identify coming multi-week trends.
So what about M-3 the past week? The latest figures show that on a seasonally adjusted basis, M-3 rose 27.3 billion last week, a 14.0 percent annualized clip, and is up $76 billion over the past month, a 9.8 percent growth rate. But those are the massaged numbers. For the raw figures, fasten your seat belt. Are you ready? M-3 was increased $58.7 billion last week (that does not include the huge Repo infusions noted above), a 30.0 percent annualized rate of growth. For the past two week, the Fed added $93.5 billion to the money supply, a 24.0 percent annual clip. Over the past 6 weeks it is up $192.9 billion, a 16.7 percent Banana Republic hyperinflationary pace. This is nuts, folks — unless there is an incredible risk out there we are not being told about. That is a lot of money for the Plunge Protection Team’s arsenal to buy markets — stocks, bonds, currencies, whatever. This level of irresponsible money supply growth makes shorting markets hazardous, yet at the same time says markets are at huge risk of declining. Maybe M-3 growth doesn’t stop the decline this time. Should be a fascinating storm in 2006.
The recent rise in Gold catalogued 74 points over about a month, a 16 percent rally from precisely the day the Fed announced it would hide M-3 from taxpayers and citizens of this great nation. That is no coincidence. Gold sees hyperinflation, monetization of debt, and intervention into free markets. Gold is telling us it expects Ben Bernanke to be an inflationist.
Don’t miss Dr. McHugh’s interview with CBS radio at WWJ 950 AM on December 30th, 2005. You can access this station through the internet by clicking on www.wwj.com . Jayne Bowers presents Dr. McHugh’s views on the Fed’s decision to drop M-3, the Plunge Protection Team, and new Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke.
“For a child will be born to us, a son will be given to us; And the government will rest on His shoulders; And His name will be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Eternal Father, Prince of Peace.” Isaiah 9:6
CONTACT INFORMATION Robert McHugh, Ph.D. Main Line Investors, Inc. TechnicalIndicatorIndex.com Kimberton, PA USA
I sourced it. Investors Business Daily. Now that you have proven to be better at me than conversational math, let's see if you can read as well as I can. As for proving my Gold profits to your Altria profits you do not have to rely on my math, my brokergae firm provides me with statements [math already done].
Yep. Having gold based money drove the Europeans into excessive imperialism to try to steal everyone's gold. There just ain't enough gold to back the world's supply of money.
Ignore him at your financial peril.
You saying Investors Business Daily doesn't really count as a source. No link? How about you show the low price and the high price and show it works out to 267%?
Somehow, I believe that I made money trading Gold, as a percentage of dollars invested than you did owning Altria.
Do you want to add a word to your original claim?
As for proving my Gold profits to your Altria profits you do not have to rely on my math, my brokergae firm provides me with statements [math already done].
Your firm shows your unrealized profits as a % of your original investment? Then how could you have made the math mistakes you made?
Putting money into gold, is to secure some stability should the market fluctuate. It is not a tool to prepare for anarchy.
In anarchy, two things will determine who the warlords are...Guns and Grain.
In desperate times a person will trade a year's wages for a bushel of food.
No, Sister Mary English! You know what I meant.
Your firm shows your unrealized profits as a % of your original investment? Then how could you have made the math mistakes you made?
Because, Sister Mary Math, I do not carry my trading statements around to argue investment points with a guy who talks about the performance he had on one single stock. Show me your worst one, or your average, not your best one. I did not own a single share of stock last year. I was up 44.3% with my biggest daily draw down being 1.5% trading US, TY, EU, GC, CL, ND, and SP. I do not need dividends, because I have profits.
PEACE OUT!
Is that real percentages or imaginary IBD percentages? Just so you can understand how wrong your 267% claim was:
Now, taking the low of about $252 in 1999, a 267% gain would take gold up to about $924. I haven't checked today, is gold that high yet?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.