Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. puts sanctions on Chinese firms for aiding Tehran
THE WASHINGTON TIMES ^ | December 27, 2005 | By Bill Gertz

Posted on 12/27/2005 5:20:48 AM PST by .cnI redruM

Several Chinese companies involved in selling missile goods and chemical-arms materials to Iran have been hit with U.S. sanctions, Bush administration officials said yesterday.

The sanctions cover six Chinese government-run companies, two Indian firms and one Austrian company, according to officials who spoke on the condition of anonymity.

The penalties have been under consideration since April and were approved by Deputy Secretary of State Robert B. Zoellick within the past several weeks.

An announcement will be published in the U.S. government's Federal Register in the next several days -- and perhaps as early as today, the officials said.

(Excerpt) Read more at washtimes.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: axisofevil; billgertz; chemweapons; china; iran; irannukes; missiles; sanctions; trade
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last
THis may be the build-up to a new war. That would be sad, but that's how it worked w/ Japan, prior to WWII and with Iraq, prior to Iraqi Freedom.
1 posted on 12/27/2005 5:20:49 AM PST by .cnI redruM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM
BUY AMERICAN

2 posted on 12/27/2005 5:25:54 AM PST by RedBloodedAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM

bump


3 posted on 12/27/2005 5:26:13 AM PST by F14 Pilot (Democracy is a process not a product)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM

and they got their missile tech from , WHO?


4 posted on 12/27/2005 5:57:38 AM PST by sure_fine (*not one to over kill the thought process*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sure_fine

>>>six Chinese government-run companies, two Indian firms and one Austrian company


5 posted on 12/27/2005 5:59:01 AM PST by .cnI redruM (If you're gonna think, you might as well think big." - Donald Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: sure_fine
and they got their missile tech from , WHO?

I don't know, Clinton maybe?

6 posted on 12/27/2005 5:59:27 AM PST by Mark17
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM

China and Iran, strange bedfellows, no? Is it just business, or do the Chicoms have more sinister motives?


7 posted on 12/27/2005 6:24:48 AM PST by Rennes Templar ("The future ain't what it used to be".........Yogi Berra)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rennes Templar

I wonder who the Iranians hired to get the oil out of Iran??


8 posted on 12/27/2005 6:34:46 AM PST by Liberfighter (The NSA- The Ultimate Google)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM
THis may be the build-up to a new war.

I don't agree. I think this IS the new war.

Who has the most to gain from the US expending our military budget on the War on Terror, leaving little left to take on other threats? Who has the most to gain from our existing military being restructured to fight a Third-world IED/guerilla conflict rather than an opponent with a huge conventional army and credible air force?

I think when it all comes out, we fill find that a lot of the Islamist players were Chinese proxies

9 posted on 12/27/2005 6:38:55 AM PST by SauronOfMordor (A planned society is most appealing to those with the hubris to think they will be the planners)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM

"THis may be the build-up to a new war."

Seems they have been sanctioned before....

"The officials said that three of the Chinese companies have been sanctioned in the past for illicit arms transfers -- CATIC, NORINCO and Zibo.
"NORINCO is a serial proliferator," one official said. "All these sanctions are for transfers to Iran."
The 2000 law requires the U.S. government to impose sanctions on companies or people that supply Iran with goods, services or technology related to nuclear weapons, missiles and toxic chemicals that can be used to make chemical arms.
Zibo is known to make glass-lined containers that can be used to make chemical weapons. CATIC and Norinco are involved in manufacturing missiles."


10 posted on 12/27/2005 6:40:43 AM PST by penelopesire
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RedBloodedAmerican
China is our enemy. I am taken back by Americans lack of understanding of China's motives.

Rapid military buildup over the last 15 years.
Currency manipulation.
Huge trade imbalance.
Coddling of U.S. corporations in the name of global trade.
Stamping out human rights activist and freedom of religion.
Clamping down on the Internet/freedom of media.
Forcefully engaging Taiwan to quell Independence.
Helping our adversaries militarily from nuke technology to advanced missile tech.
Deploying forward military bases all over the world disguised as shipping and trade. Panama canal, disputed islands from Japan to the Philippines.
Formidable spy and covert intelligence operations against America and her allies.
Internet hacking attacks formulated and carried out by the Chinese military to probe for weakness in corporate networks.

You can't believe everything you read or hear, but if you research long enough, multiple sources, you begin to see patterns that are largely ignored by our lawmakers until it slaps them in the face.
11 posted on 12/27/2005 6:52:10 AM PST by servantboy777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RedBloodedAmerican
and your car wont work!
12 posted on 12/27/2005 7:00:31 AM PST by illbenice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: servantboy777

Well said!! Too bad this isn't covered by the media. Hopefully, America will wake up before it's too late.


13 posted on 12/27/2005 7:07:43 AM PST by panaxanax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head; ImaGraftedBranch

Ping.


14 posted on 12/27/2005 7:21:39 AM PST by Ultra Sonic 007 (The opposite of Progress is Congress)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: servantboy777

Study the Clinton years long enough, and the picture comes into focus, but good! I have been utterly shocked to see the Republican indifference when it came to China (and Mexico as a matter of fact).

How much of North Korea's program was Chinese derived? How much of Iran's current program was Chinese derived?

China's playing for keeps, and our leaders seem to just be playing.

We prevented Russia form gaining a foothold in Central and South America, but don't seem to think anything of China gaining a foothold there.


15 posted on 12/27/2005 7:29:21 AM PST by DoughtyOne (MSM: Public support for war waining. 403/3 House vote against pullout vaporizes another lie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: panaxanax
It could already be too late. I don't want to sound like an alarmist or conspiracy nut but, the Chinese economy has grown at double digits for several years with no end in sight. The military buildup is financed at double digits from this booming economy.

Two recent articles touted first the HUGE trade deficit in the U.S. with China, the other article reported on the HUGE trade surplus that China enjoys with the U.S.

If you put it together and you will see the delta between the deficit and surplus further exaggerates the problem in that to overcome the deficit, you must first overcome the difference between the two. I'm no economics major, but thats the simple math to it all.

Congress has allowed U.S. corporations to sell out the American people in the name of globalization. Cheap labor is the game. More dollars at the bottom line.

The corporation in which I am employed is a 40 Billion dollar company (40 Billion). That's larger than the GDP of many small countries, yet it's not enough.

My corporation farms out to China on a regular basis and are accelerating the pace as most U.S. corps are.

Placing all of this manufacturing technology and capital in a foreign country that is our adversary is a very dangerous game.
16 posted on 12/27/2005 7:32:31 AM PST by servantboy777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: illbenice

Boycott China, not Japan! LOL


17 posted on 12/27/2005 7:37:29 AM PST by RedBloodedAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Liberfighter

Why, Halliburton, of course!


18 posted on 12/27/2005 7:38:02 AM PST by RedBloodedAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SauronOfMordor; Iris7
I don't agree. I think this IS the new war. Who has the most to gain from the US expending our military budget on the War on Terror, leaving little left to take on other threats? Who has the most to gain from our existing military being restructured to fight a Third-world IED/guerilla conflict rather than an opponent with a huge conventional army and credible air force?

I think when it all comes out, we fill find that a lot of the Islamist players were Chinese proxies

Very insightful. And we cannot forget our enemy that we've got to fight right here at home in our own government: Democrats.

Remaining vigilant to prevent them from keeping our intelligence services and special ops from learning the truth is key.

19 posted on 12/27/2005 7:38:17 AM PST by demkicker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: servantboy777

The only hedge on selling out the American economy in favor of globalism that provides a potential enemy with the resources to build up it's military to regional strike capacity is the nuclear threat.

And in doing that a whole new can of worms has been opened.


20 posted on 12/27/2005 7:40:50 AM PST by Rebelbase (Green bean casserole is a culinary curse upon mankind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson