Skip to comments.
Permafrost Could Be Melting, Study Finds
AP on Yahoo ^
| 12/26/05
| AP
Posted on 12/26/2005 6:53:57 PM PST by NormsRevenge
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-78 last
To: CindyDawg
I could be the cookie monster....
To: SlowBoat407
Well, if you want to get technical, it should be Hippopotamoi and Hippopotamos from the Greek - "Hippos" Horse and Potamos "River" the -i suffix is a latin masculine Nominative plural and isn't used for Greek stem words, including Anglicized Greek Stems. The -oi suffix is the Greek masculine Nominative plural noun suffix.
62
posted on
12/27/2005 7:35:58 AM PST
by
ZULU
(Non nobis, non nobis, Domine, sed nomini tuo da gloriam. God, guts, and guns made America great.)
To: ZULU
HA! I drew you out!
Thanks for the correction. I love learning new stuff. "Mesopotamia" now makes a lot more sense as a word: "between rivers"
63
posted on
12/27/2005 7:40:36 AM PST
by
SlowBoat407
(The best stuff happens just before the thread snaps.)
To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
To: Clara Lou
Anchorage doesn't have a permafrost problem (that I know of).
This picture shows the utilidors (utility corridors) in Inuvik NWT. They are above-ground wood-covered corridors for the water, sewer, etc. The water is preheated, so it won't (often) freeze in the distribution pipes. Notice that the houses are elevated, with an unheated crawl space beneath them, to preserve the permafrost.
To: NormsRevenge
It's Bush's fault.
Bush lied - glaciers died.
66
posted on
12/27/2005 9:51:21 AM PST
by
Hoodat
( Silly Dems)
To: USFRIENDINVICTORIA
Thanks for posting the pic. I've never seen an arrangement like that.
67
posted on
12/27/2005 9:51:40 AM PST
by
Clara Lou
(A conservative is a liberal who has been mugged by reality. --I. Kristol)
To: Nick5
A warmer earth is a GOOD thing folks...... at least for mammals.
To: ZULU
The trouble here is that there are actually people who believe that the earth stands still and climate is not to change nor was it ever intended to change. The logic here...is illogic. This grand earth...for all practical purposes...has never stayed the same. It changes constantly, and cannot be held at one particular climate. It truely amazes me that countess numbers of college-educated people believe otherwise.
To: Eska
I lived in the Yukon for 25 years -- mostly in Whitehorse, which just has a bit of discontinuous permafrost. We had a cement basement in one house, then wood-frame basements on concrete slabs (below the frost line) the rest of the time.
Your area must have good drainage, which makes the permafrost much easier to deal with.
I know what you mean about extremes of climate -- years ago, I worked outside in that weather. You start to understand why "Sam McGee from Tennessee" just wanted to be cremated.
To: Cvengr
71
posted on
12/27/2005 10:05:29 AM PST
by
brytlea
(I'm not a conspiracy theorist....really.)
To: HamiltonJay
Good for some, extremely bad for others--like any other simple fact. All what you make of it.
72
posted on
12/27/2005 10:12:33 AM PST
by
Nick5
To: NormsRevenge
but isn't global warming a good thing? less of a need for heating oil!
73
posted on
12/27/2005 10:13:09 AM PST
by
absolootezer0
("My God, why have you forsaken us.. no wait, its the liberals that have forsaken you... my bad")
To: NormsRevenge
according to a federal study. yeah, federal study. Now there is something to hang your hat on. And let me guess, the only way to stop this melting is through some expensive federal program.
74
posted on
12/27/2005 10:15:19 AM PST
by
Casloy
To: NormsRevenge
There was an article in the WSJ that said that the change in the ocean currents that are driving the warm currents away from the northern shores is a result of the Phillippine volcano, Pinajaro. The article went on to state that if present trends continue, Great Britain could have a Siberian-like climate, sometime in the future. According to the article, this is anything but global warming.
75
posted on
12/27/2005 10:17:32 AM PST
by
Eva
To: NormsRevenge
So, now tell me again how this works.
A (theoretical) 2 to 4 degree RISE in temperature is supposed to (somehow) melt permafrost that is more than 10 degrees BELOW the accepted freezing point of ice?
Never mind that we are ALREADY at 50% of the supposed max CO2 increase postulated by the absurd limits of the Kyoto treaty, yet have STILL not seen any appreciable rise in global temperature.
So, if increasing CO2 (to half its regulated maximum!) DID NOT affect global temperature changes by a measurable amount, how is limiting CO to the treaty maximum (and at the same time destroying the US economy!) going to prevent further increase in global temperature?
76
posted on
12/27/2005 10:23:57 AM PST
by
Robert A Cook PE
(I can only donate monthly, but Hillary's ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
To: Clara Lou
Anchorage (as far as I can tell!) is waaaaaaaaaaay too far south to have permafrost conditions.
77
posted on
12/27/2005 10:26:15 AM PST
by
Robert A Cook PE
(I can only donate monthly, but Hillary's ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
To: NormsRevenge
Permafrost Could Be Melting, Study Finds Great! Just think of the benefits; digging fence posts, basements, etc. would be much easier and less-costly now!
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-78 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson