To: Virginia-American
Wikipedia, now there's an expert on disputed stories.
464 posted on
12/28/2005 2:26:37 PM PST by
x5452
To: x5452
I linked to wikipedia because it gave a biography of Lady Hope, not just the Darwin story. I see no reason to doubt that the claims they made are true.
Basically, what we have is a claim by someone with both ego-based and pecuniary reasons for (ahem) exaggerating
Versus
The testimony of members of Darwin's family, whom I am quite sure were at his deathbed, some of whom would have liked it if their famous relative had had a deathbed conversion.
Are you aware of any sources for the Lady's story other than herself? Do you see that there might be a bit of self-promotion in her claim?
To: x5452; Virginia-American
now there's an expert on disputed stories.
It's not a disputed story. It's been denied by everyone who actually knew Darwin and debunked by both sides of this debate.
Even "Answers in Genesis" admits that it isn't true, yet it gets trotted out with great regluarity by creationists on these threads who either don't know or don't care that it's a lie.
467 posted on
12/29/2005 6:44:19 AM PST by
highball
("I find that the harder I work, the more luck I seem to have." -- Thomas Jefferson)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson