now there's an expert on disputed stories.
It's not a disputed story. It's been denied by everyone who actually knew Darwin and debunked by both sides of this debate.
Even "Answers in Genesis" admits that it isn't true, yet it gets trotted out with great regluarity by creationists on these threads who either don't know or don't care that it's a lie.
If it isn't true find a site not well known for bias.
WikiPedia is a hotbed of propaganda.
If you have a better source, then list it. If not don't be surprised if people ignore your source.