To: b_sharp
Teach a correct version of the ToE and evolution, including those areas where knowledge is incomplete (and what is being done to rectify the shortage), without mentioning the typical creationist strawman arguments. Better yet teach the strawman arguments, and carefully denote why they are invalid as logical arguments OR contain shoddy science.
To avoid charges of anti-religious bigotry, show examples of "scientific" errors and show how they were discovered and refuted...
Clearer thinking is always a good idea.
287 posted on
12/26/2005 9:05:36 PM PST by
grey_whiskers
(The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
To: grey_whiskers
"Better yet teach the strawman arguments, and carefully denote why they are invalid as logical arguments OR contain shoddy science. "To avoid charges of anti-religious bigotry, show examples of "scientific" errors and show how they were discovered and refuted...
Clearer thinking is always a good idea.
Excellent suggestions. They may have to add another class or shorten the list of science facts taught in current classes to get it all in, but I agree that critical thinking at that level is more important than simply digesting context free facts.
366 posted on
12/27/2005 9:47:40 AM PST by
b_sharp
(Science adjusts theories to fit evidence, creationism distorts evidence to fit the Bible.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson