Let me know how that works out for evolution. Until then, I guess we'll just have to accept it by faith.
"Science is a discipline of observation, hypothesis construction, testing, modification of hypothesis with the prospect of developing sufficient support or refutation of a theory.
Let me know how that works out for evolution.
Actually, it's workd out pretty well:
Observation - we see, for example, various fossils trapped in stone. Looking closer, we notice that the simplest (one-cell) fossils are always on the bottom, with increasingly more complex creatures as you go higher up the layers. The age of each layer also decreases as you go up...
And then using the brains that GOD GAVE US, it's not a stretch to suppose that life may have evolved from the simple to the complex. Good old common sense (God gave us that too).
Sure beats the magic "bing, it's there" proposal.
Let me know how that works out for evolution. Until then, I guess we'll just have to accept it by faith.
Here is a data point. No faith required. What say you? (Handsome young lad too.)
Site: Nariokotome, West Turkana, Kenya (1)
Discovered By: K. Kimeu, 1984 (1)
Estimated Age of Fossil: 1.6 mya * determined by Stratigraphic, faunal & radiometric data (1, 4)
Species Name: Homo ergaster (1, 7, 8), Homo erectus (3, 4, 7, 10), Homo erectus ergaster (25)
Gender: Male (based on pelvis, browridge) (1, 8, 9)
Cranial Capacity: 880 (909 as adult) cc (1)
Information: Most complete early hominid skeleton (80 bones and skull) (1, 8)
Interpretation: Hairless and dark pigmented body (based on environment, limb proportions) (7, 8, 9). Juvenile (9-12 based on 2nd molar eruption and unfused growth plates) (1, 3, 4, 7, 8). Juvenile (8 years old based on recent studies on tooth development) (27). Incapable of speech (based on narrowing of spinal canal in thoracic region) (1)
Nickname: Turkana Boy (1), Nariokotome Boy
See original source for notes:
Source: http://www.mos.org/evolution/fossils/fossilview.php?fid=38