Politicall she is similiar to Guiliani and McCain. She looks good on foreign policy, but she is pro-abortion.
----
Views on the philosophical topic of abortion do not make a President. She would make a good President, IMHO, BECAUSE of her foreign policy EXPERIENCE, and domestically, she has the intelligence to know what is right for America, BUT, possibly like Bush, she would not do what is right, domestically, for America...and frankly, I don't know if anyone in Washington, excepting a very few, like Pence, would even stand up for what is SERIOUSLY NEEDED in domestic America -- the problem is the government, not the people. Spending and taxation, uncontrolled illegal immigration, open borders, Constituion-busting activism on the SCOTUS, gross negligence in government oversight (9/11, ABLE DANGER, bogus commissions like the 9/11 Commission, etc.), all these things need SERIOUS FIXING.
So, WHO in Washington will have the guts or motivation to do what is really needed ??? -- not just warm the Oval Office chair and tax and spend us to death...
This argument has nothing to do with whether Dr. Rice would make a good president. I believe that she would.
I am pro-life, but I am willing to stipulate that a President's view on abortion is not essential to his or her abolility to do her job. The elder Bush had a similiar view to Rice's.
Nevertheless, as I said before, the nomination of a pro-life Republican is bound to ignite a third-party candidacy that will hand the Democrat nominee the election.
There are other options besides Rice.
Seceretly I think Morris, in his heart of hearts, is rooting for this. The Democrats have disowned him. Without Clinton-hatred attract Conservative readers, his writing career is over.