Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: edcoil

I've been trying, but I can't see how Nepal, whether it goes commie or not, important to the national security of the US. It's hardly what you would call strategically located.

It's sandwiched between the two most populous countries in the world, both of which are becoming more powerful all the time. It is isolated from China by the highest mountains in the world and from India by flat land. Seems like Nepal is, and should be, India's concern, not ours.


13 posted on 12/24/2005 1:49:09 PM PST by Restorer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: Restorer

True, India should be concerned, but they seem to be more interested in interfering with Nepal's internal politics than with their own national security.


14 posted on 12/24/2005 1:54:26 PM PST by Tailgunner Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: Restorer

India's lost Nepal already, seems like. Its like the US 'losing' Canada, I guess. Whatever you do, whatever your best intentions, you're way too big to ever be popular there.


15 posted on 12/24/2005 2:04:21 PM PST by voletti (Where there is no justice, there is only revenge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: Restorer
I've been trying, but I can't see how Nepal, whether it goes commie or not, important to the national security of the US

You'd be happy with the Chinese having Gurkhas?
17 posted on 12/24/2005 2:10:07 PM PST by English Nationalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson