Police tell Christian couple view on gays 'close to hate crime' (UK)

Times (UK) ^ | 12/22/05 | David Sanderson

[jalisco555]

POLICE questioned a retired couple for 80 minutes about their “homophobic” views after they asked their local council if they could display their Christian literature next to gay rights leaflets, it was reported last night.

Joe and Helen Roberts said that police officers warned them that their actions “were close to a hate crime” after they complained to Wyre Borough Council about its gay rights policies.

The couple claimed that the police told them they were “walking on eggshells”.

Mr Roberts, from Fleetwood, Lancashire, said he had been offended because of the council’s distribution of the gay rights leaflets and its promotion of its theatre as a venue for civil partnership ceremonies.

He said he complained to Paul Deacon, the council officer responsible for Wyre’s part in the Navajo Charter Mark campaign being run by several local authorities to offer assistance to gay and lesbian people.

Mr Roberts, 73, told the Daily Mail: “I told him I was offended. I asked him if I could put Christian literature on display alongside the gay material. He said I couldn’t because it would offend gay people.

“I said we had no objection to gay people, but we thought that homosexual practice was wrong and we were offended by the gay culture which the council is promoting.

“They warned me that being discriminatory and homophobic is in line with hate crime. The phrase they used was that we were ‘walking on eggshells’. I asked the officer, if I phoned the police with a complaint that the council were discriminating against Christians would he go to interview them?”

Lancashire police said its visit to the Robertses’ family home was a matter of routine after a complaint from the council. A spokesman added: “Words of suitable advice were given and we will not be taking any further action.”

Joan Humble, the Labour MP for Blackpool North and Fleetwood, said the council’s decision to call the police was heavy handed.

She added: “Navajo is a very good project to offer support to gay people. But they should have replied to Mr and Mrs Roberts to explain their policy and allay their fears about the nature of the literature.”

A council spokesman said the couple had “displayed potentially homophobic attitudes”.

He added: “The council referred this matter to the police for further investigation with the intention of challenging attitudes and educating and raising awareness of the implications of homophobic behaviour.”

This month a Metropolitan Police officer telephoned the author Lynette Burrows at her home in Cambridge after she took part in a BBC Radio 5 Live programme. He told her that her broadcast view that gay couples were not good adoptive parents for boys had been reported and recorded as a homophobic incident.

[mountn man]

Usually the gay community is the most vocal about abortion, particularly the lesbofeminazis. And one of there claims is to prevent birth defects.

Meanwhile Christians are the most vocal against abortion, even if a child might have a birth defect.

Now the gay community claims that homosexuality is something that is born with, and not a choice.

Well if its a birth defect, where is there stand on abortion then? If homosexuality cannot be considered a birth defect, But a natural occurance of nature, what in the name of "tolerance" do you call Downs or Wolfs syndrome?

Either they would abort all with "defects", or none.

If they won't admit a birth root cause to homosexuality, then it must be a choice. Which means that the 1% are trying to impose their CHOSEN morals and view points upon the established morals of the 99%, who have also chosen their beliefs.

Why is it that when a person "is" gay, its part of who they are, and affects everypart of their life? And yet for heterosexuals it affects a small portion of our life.