Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Nuclear Monitoring of Muslims Done Without Search Warrants
US News & World Report ^ | 12/22/2005 | David E. Kaplan

Posted on 12/23/2005 2:41:55 PM PST by wjersey

In search of a terrorist nuclear bomb, the federal government since 9/11 has run a far-reaching, top secret program to monitor radiation levels at over a hundred Muslim sites in the Washington, D.C., area, including mosques, homes, businesses, and warehouses, plus similar sites in at least five other cities, U.S. News has learned. In numerous cases, the monitoring required investigators to go on to the property under surveillance, although no search warrants or court orders were ever obtained, according to those with knowledge of the program. Some participants were threatened with loss of their jobs when they questioned the legality of the operation, according to these accounts.

Federal officials familiar with the program maintain that warrants are unneeded for the kind of radiation sampling the operation entails, but some legal scholars disagree. News of the program comes in the wake of revelations last week that, after 9/11, the Bush White House approved electronic surveillance of U.S. targets by the National Security Agency without court orders. These and other developments suggest that the federal government's domestic spying programs since 9/11 have been far broader than previously thought.

The nuclear surveillance program began in early 2002 and has been run by the FBI and the Department of Energy's Nuclear Emergency Support Team (NEST). Two individuals, who declined to be named because the program is highly classified, spoke to U.S. News because of their concerns about the legality of the program. At its peak, they say, the effort involved three vehicles in Washington, D.C., monitoring 120 sites per day, nearly all of them Muslim targets drawn up by the FBI. For some ten months, officials conducted daily monitoring, and they have resumed daily checks during periods of high threat. The program has also operated in at least five other cities when threat levels there have risen: Chicago, Detroit, Las Vegas, New York, and Seattle.

FBI officials expressed concern that discussion of the program would expose sensitive methods used in counterterrorism. Although NEST staffers have demonstrated their techniques on national television as recently as October, U.S. News has omitted details of how the monitoring is conducted. Officials from four different agencies declined to respond on the record about the classified program: the FBI, Energy Department, Justice Department, and National Security Council. "We don't ever comment on deployments," said Bryan Wilkes, a spokesman for DOE's National Nuclear Security Administration, which manages NEST.

In Washington, the sites monitored have included prominent mosques and office buildings in suburban Maryland and Virginia. One source close to the program said that participants "were tasked on a daily and nightly basis," and that FBI and Energy Department officials held regular meetings to update the monitoring list. "The targets were almost all U.S. citizens," says the source. "A lot of us thought it was questionable, but people who complained nearly lost their jobs. We were told it was perfectly legal."

The question of search warrants is controversial, however. To ensure accurate readings, in up to 15 percent of the cases the monitoring needed to take place on private property, sources say, such as on mosque parking lots and private driveways. Government officials familiar with the program insist it is legal; warrants are unneeded for monitoring from public property, they say, as well as from publicly accessible driveways and parking lots. "If a delivery man can access it, so can we," says one.

Georgetown University Professor David Cole, a constitutional law expert, disagrees. Surveillance of public spaces such as mosques or public businesses might well be allowable without a court order, he argues, but not private offices or homes: "They don't need a warrant to drive onto the property -- the issue isn't where they are, but whether they're using a tactic to intrude on privacy. It seems to me that they are, and that they would need a warrant or probable cause."

Cole points to a 2001 Supreme Court decision, U.S. vs. Kyllo, which looked at police use -- without a search warrant -- of thermal imaging technology to search for marijuana-growing lamps in a home. The court, in a ruling written by Justice Antonin Scalia, ruled that authorities did in fact need a warrant -- that the heat sensors violated the Fourth Amendment's clause against unreasonable search and seizure. But officials familiar with the FBI/NEST program say the radiation sensors are different and are only sampling the surrounding air. "This kind of program only detects particles in the air, it's non directional," says one knowledgeable official. "It's not a whole lot different from smelling marijuana."

Officials also reject any notion that the program specifically has targeted Muslims. "We categorically do not target places of worship or entities solely based on ethnicity or religious affiliation," says one. "Our investigations are intelligence driven and based on a criminal predicate."

Among those said to be briefed on the monitoring program were Vice President Richard Cheney; Michael Brown, then-director of the Federal Emergency Management Administration; and Richard Clarke, then a top counterterrorism official at the National Security Council. After 9/11, top officials grew increasingly concerned over the prospect of nuclear terrorism. Just weeks after the World Trade Center attacks, a dubious informant named Dragonfire warned that al Qaeda had smuggled a nuclear device into New York City; NEST teams swept the city and found nothing. But as evidence seized from Afghan camps confirmed al Qaeda's interest in nuclear technology, radiation detectors were temporarily installed along Washington, D.C., highways and the Muslim monitoring program began.

Most staff for the monitoring came from NEST, which draws from nearly 1,000 nuclear scientists and technicians based largely at the country's national laboratories. For 30 years, NEST undercover teams have combed suspected sites looking for radioactive material, using high-tech detection gear fitted onto various aircraft, vehicles, and even backpacks and attaché cases. No dirty bombs or nuclear devices have ever been found - and that includes the post-9/11 program. "There were a lot of false positives, and one or two were alarming," says one source. "But in the end we found nothing."


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: counterterrorism; homelandsecurity; islam; mosques; nest; nsa; nuclear; ohthehumanity; patriotleak; radioactivematerial; spying; surveillance; terrorism; trop; wmd
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-147 next last
Here we go again - this will send the MSM nuts
1 posted on 12/23/2005 2:41:57 PM PST by wjersey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: wjersey
Here we go again

Indeed, I just read this article on Free Republic 5 minutes ago. :-)
2 posted on 12/23/2005 2:44:29 PM PST by msnimje (Political Correctness -- An OFFENSIVE attempt not to offend.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wjersey

Or do they mean "Didn't want to find anything.."


3 posted on 12/23/2005 2:45:30 PM PST by xcamel (a system poltergeist stole it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wjersey
How is doing radiation detection anywhere an infringement of anyone's rights? Who is harmed and how?
4 posted on 12/23/2005 2:46:06 PM PST by Clara Lou (A conservative is a liberal who has been mugged by reality. --I. Kristol)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wjersey
Two individuals, who declined to be named because the program is highly classified, spoke to U.S. News because of their concerns about the legality of the program.

These traitors should be identified, tried, convicted, and sentenced to death by firing squad!
5 posted on 12/23/2005 2:46:09 PM PST by joseph20
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wjersey
"Officials also reject any notion that the program specifically has targeted Muslims."

And why the hell not?

Shouldn't they be using their heads and targeting the most-likely groups?
Instead of for example, white grandmothers etc.?

6 posted on 12/23/2005 2:47:26 PM PST by Redbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wjersey
"...this will send the MSM nuts"

For most of them, that would be a short trip within their own zipcode!

7 posted on 12/23/2005 2:49:05 PM PST by Redbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joseph20
This is simply stupid. I can walk down the street with a radiation detector capable of picking up anything, for hundreds of feet, that could constitute a threat. Radiation is easily detected at very low levels. I can't do that because I don't have a warrant? Reporters are just too stupid for words.
8 posted on 12/23/2005 2:49:17 PM PST by Timmy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: wjersey

So do we have yet another classified leak here?

> ... but some legal scholars disagree.

Gratuitous snipe by Legacy Media.
Didn't USN&WR used to be respectable?


9 posted on 12/23/2005 2:49:34 PM PST by Boundless
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wjersey

I was wrong -- Same $hit, Different Article!!


10 posted on 12/23/2005 2:50:20 PM PST by msnimje (Political Correctness -- An OFFENSIVE attempt not to offend.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wjersey

If only we had this before 9/11/2001...


11 posted on 12/23/2005 2:50:48 PM PST by Dallas59 (“You love life, while we love death"( Al-Qaeda & Democratic Party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Boundless
"Didn't USN&WR used to be respectable?"

Yes, but that was a long long time ago.

12 posted on 12/23/2005 2:51:00 PM PST by Redbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: joseph20

Amen, bro. The MSM crossed the line, again. Does the NWS need a warrant to measure the temperature or rainfall? Does your city need a warrant to take a picture of your car if the radar says you are speeding?


13 posted on 12/23/2005 2:51:11 PM PST by RKV ( He who has the guns, makes the rules.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: wjersey

Chris Matthews: "Why does this administration insist on trampling on our civil liberties?"

BOOM!

Chris Matthews: "Who in this administration screwed up and didn't know there was a nuclear device in the country?"


14 posted on 12/23/2005 2:51:44 PM PST by John Jorsett (scam never sleeps)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wjersey

Why don't we publish everything we do to stop terror and be done with it?


15 posted on 12/23/2005 2:52:18 PM PST by Loyal Buckeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joseph20

If the Attorney General doesn't get a set of balls soon.What good is he? Maybe there is another prositution ring that needs investigating.Yo Gonzales stinkin do something.


16 posted on 12/23/2005 2:53:11 PM PST by magua
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: wjersey

Too bad they weren't also looking for handguns. Then it would have been alright.


17 posted on 12/23/2005 2:53:39 PM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RKV

I'M GETTIN' REALLY P!$$ED OFF! Catch theses jerks. They're TRAITORS!


18 posted on 12/23/2005 2:54:10 PM PST by Dr. Bogus Pachysandra ("Don't touch that thing")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: wjersey

Any administration that doesn't take whatever means necessary to ferret out these bastards is guilty of neglecting the number one national priority: protecting our country and her peoples.(plural intended)

Thank God we have a CIC with the guts to do it, rather than issue the equivalent of an OSHA inspection, where they send you a letter saying that they're coming in to look your place over in a month.

Radical Islam has declared its intention to destroy our country and our way of life. Playing nice and blind, unilateral adherence to PC rules will help them do it.

It's time to wake up, MSM and Dems.


19 posted on 12/23/2005 2:55:01 PM PST by DJ Frisat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: msnimje
You probably searched for previous posts of this article without a warrant!!!!!
20 posted on 12/23/2005 2:55:49 PM PST by coloradan (Failing to protect the liberties of your enemies establishes precedents that will reach to yourself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-147 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson