Skip to comments.
US monitored Muslim sites for radiation: report
Yahoo ^
| 12/23/05
Posted on 12/23/2005 12:00:17 PM PST by Sub-Driver
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 341-345 next last
To: Mo1
Gosh darn it, I want these leakers arrested, and I want the publications that print such stuff shut down!
81
posted on
12/23/2005 1:12:40 PM PST
by
Miss Marple
(Lord, please look after Mozart Lover's son and keep him strong.)
To: Blood of Tyrants
Well now that they know we are watching they can do a better job of shielding the material.
82
posted on
12/23/2005 1:15:30 PM PST
by
redangus
To: Restorer
Why are you picking on us poor Lutherans (WELS here)? </sarcasm?>
83
posted on
12/23/2005 1:16:12 PM PST
by
steveegg
(Take two - throw those long knives at the DemonRATs and lieberals - and include the RINOs)
To: Sub-Driver
Let the lefties rant. The more they whine and posture over issues that are quite obviously in the countries best interest; the more they will be exposed as the traitors they are. The left is isolating itself from the American people. So long as the right side of the isle keeps their foot out of thier mouths; the left rant will turn into a feable whimper.
84
posted on
12/23/2005 1:18:58 PM PST
by
Dawggie
To: Sub-Driver
It is chilling to see our top-secret secrets spilled in public like fish guts on the cleaning table.
Why would anyone think it wise to alert potential terrorists that we are keeping an eye on them. This will simply make it easier for them to avoid our prying eyes, and that puts everyone at extreme danger.
We need some prosecutions on some of these leaks, but quick!
85
posted on
12/23/2005 1:21:10 PM PST
by
DoughtyOne
(MSM: Public support for war waining. 403/3 House vote against pullout vaporizes another lie.)
To: Blood of Tyrants
This infriges upon our atomic civil rights. We are living in a dictatorship.
86
posted on
12/23/2005 1:23:54 PM PST
by
Rebelbase
(Green bean casserole is a culinary curse upon mankind.)
To: Sub-Driver
And I thought our government was not being serious enough about the threats, thank you George.
87
posted on
12/23/2005 1:26:13 PM PST
by
Raycpa
To: oceanview
The Supreme Court ruled that using infrared scanners to look for evidence of crimes without a warrant was unconstitutional. Scalia wrote the majority opinion..
"We think that obtaining by sense-enhancing technology any information regarding the interior of the home that could not otherwise have been obtained without physical "intrusion into a constitutionally protected area",(Silverman, 365 U.S., at 512), constitutes a search-at least where (as here) the technology in question is not in general public use."
88
posted on
12/23/2005 1:26:52 PM PST
by
Sols
To: TChris
The lack of response against these leakers is puzzling.
89
posted on
12/23/2005 1:29:08 PM PST
by
TheDon
(The Democratic Party is the party of TREASON!)
To: Sub-Driver
That Fisa judge who resigned leaking this crap?
90
posted on
12/23/2005 1:29:52 PM PST
by
Raycpa
To: Mo1
I want to know WHO IS THE LEAKER
Leakers would be more accurate. From the
original US News Article:
Two individuals, who declined to be named because the program is highly classified, spoke to U.S. News because of their concerns about the legality of the program. At its peak, they say, the effort involved three vehicles in Washington, D.C., monitoring 120 sites per day, nearly all of them Muslim targets drawn up by the FBI.
--Snip--
One source close to the program said that participants "were tasked on a daily and nightly basis," and that FBI and Energy Department officials held regular meetings to update the monitoring list. "The targets were almost all U.S. citizens," says the source. "A lot of us thought it was questionable, but people who complained nearly lost their jobs. We were told it was perfectly legal."
--Snip--
Among those said to be briefed on the monitoring program were Vice President Richard Cheney; Michael Brown, then-director of the Federal Emergency Management Administration; and Richard Clarke, then a top counterterrorism official at the National Security Council.
--Snip--
"There were a lot of false positives, and one or two were alarming," says one source. "But in the end we found nothing."
The article makes it SOUND like the leaker worked on the NEST project. But notice who is missing from the list of persons briefed about it - Senate and House Intelligence Committees.
To: DoughtyOne
Until the american people understand that we are in a war for our existance; I do not think that prosicutions would be tolerated. Right now it is not really understood that a state of war exists. In war people die inocent and solders alike and I do not think americans want to accept this. There does not seem to be a willingness to do what needs to be done. Not yet anyways.
92
posted on
12/23/2005 1:30:29 PM PST
by
Dawggie
To: Sols
sounds like the patriot act needs updating then - clearly they cannot obtain "geiger counter warrants" to conduct this activity across the nation - the only way to be proactive about it, is to detect the device in advance.
To: Sub-Driver
Someone want to tell me WHY "Top Secret Programs" are in the friggin news????????????????????????????????????????????
94
posted on
12/23/2005 1:33:23 PM PST
by
MikefromOhio
(It's amazing that a guy says he wants to nuke parts of America ON FR, but he doesn't get zotted)
To: conservative in nyc
or some persons in the FBI.
To: Sub-Driver
U.S. officials have secretly monitored radiation levels at Muslim sites, including mosques and private homes, since September 11, 2001 as part of a top secret program searching for nuclear bombs, U.S. News and World Report said on Friday.Well, I guess it isn't a secret any more, MSM D**KHEADS!
96
posted on
12/23/2005 1:33:55 PM PST
by
Yossarian
(The media is now simply running a 24/7 soap opera with Dubya cast as the arch villain.)
To: MikeinIraq
because these agencies are full of left wing career people with friends in the left wing media - like Plame and Wilson.
To: oceanview
The FBI works on or with the NEST project.
To: oceanview
I don't think they are FULL of them.
I work in one and I used to work closely with another.
It's probably one or two individuals. I kinda doubt it's an entire agency.
99
posted on
12/23/2005 1:35:27 PM PST
by
MikefromOhio
(It's amazing that a guy says he wants to nuke parts of America ON FR, but he doesn't get zotted)
To: Sub-Driver
Oh, now I'm going to rush out and buy a copy of U.S. News & World Report! If they have this sort of news, it's worth buying a copy! /s
What does this kind of irresponsible journalism buy them? It's not even sensationalist, it's just plain irresponsible and perhaps even illegal.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 341-345 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson