Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US monitored Muslim sites for radiation: report
Yahoo ^ | 12/23/05

Posted on 12/23/2005 12:00:17 PM PST by Sub-Driver

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 341-345 next last
To: Sub-Driver
Another classified program blown by a treasonous press.

Thats 3 in as many weeks: 1) "rendition" prisons; 2) wire taps on al Qaeda/US phone calls; now, 3) Geiger counters on Muslim property.

These bastards are trying to get us killed!

Is there a bumper sticker "The Democrats Can't Be Trusted With National Security" available somewhere? It's time to risk my car's welfare to get the truth out!

121 posted on 12/23/2005 1:48:44 PM PST by HardStarboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oceanview

Or flames from a fire? Sorry, Mr. homeowner. We could see see that your house was on fire but we didn't want to violate your rights by entering to put the fire out.

On another note, a major difference between thermal imaging and geiger counter is the state has a greater purpose in protecting its citizens from nuclear exposure than it does to detect a crime.


122 posted on 12/23/2005 1:50:58 PM PST by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
US Classified information should be treated like CHILD PORN.

Its time we get a Republican (if there are any left) to sponsor legislation to make it a crime to knowingly publish, distribute, reproduce or post top secret information. The mere unauthorized possession of classified information should be considered a crime.

Right now the only people subject to any restrictions regarding classified information are government employees and contractors. There is no penalty for anyone else to expose our nations most sensitive information to the entire world and directly to our enemies.

I would include a provision whereby the media could go to federal court to seek approval for the release of information that they had obtained. The court could decide if the release of the information posed a significant risk to the public as is being done now in the federal trials of terrorists. Additionally they would be required to give up their source of the classified information.

The current situation is insane. Remember when spies had to smuggle secrets out of the country on micro-film? Now they can just give it to a reporter and consider it delivered.

Just imagine if the NY-Slimes had obtained detailed information on the Manhattan Project and published it. We can no longer trust our safety to the good intentions of the MSN, they have proven to be untrustworthy.

123 posted on 12/23/2005 1:55:19 PM PST by usurper (Spelling or grammatical errors in this post can be attributed to the LA City School System)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Raycpa

but the presence of fire is not a crime.

I could see the federal courts essentially saying that any detection methods used to determine whether a house contains some item pertinent to a crime (a meth lab, a nuclear bomb) requires a warrant.


124 posted on 12/23/2005 1:57:39 PM PST by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

The Dems don't understand that the more of this kind of stuff they leak, the higher the pres's poll numbers go.


125 posted on 12/23/2005 2:00:56 PM PST by adam_az (It's the border, stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

I would be pi$$ed if we weren't doing this.

Now where are they gonna gather their dirty bomb components?

If President Bush wants to continue to keep us safe he will have to monitor more dispersed sites. This will cost millions more, that could have been better spent elsewhere protecting us.

THESE TREASONOUS LEAKS ARE REALLY STARTING TO PI$$ ME OFF!!!

PLEASE, WILL SOMEONE LOCK UP THESE SCUMBAGS????


126 posted on 12/23/2005 2:03:00 PM PST by NAVY84
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

good grief bttt


127 posted on 12/23/2005 2:05:27 PM PST by txhurl (hook'em)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

I hope they are monitoring the LEAKERS of this information including the MSM!!!


128 posted on 12/23/2005 2:05:44 PM PST by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oceanview

Arson is a crime.


129 posted on 12/23/2005 2:06:02 PM PST by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
Absolute treason to release this top secret information. The criminals responsible should all be executed.


130 posted on 12/23/2005 2:06:54 PM PST by FormerACLUmember
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Raycpa

As is monitoring polluted water that comes from property.


131 posted on 12/23/2005 2:07:01 PM PST by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

"The news magazine said in its online edition that the far-reaching program covered more than a hundred sites in the Washington, D.C., area and at least five other cities"

I'm surprised it's such a small number.

If 90% of the World's terrorism was committed by Baptists and Baptist churches were frequently used in the major plots that the Feds would (correctly) choose to keep an eye on Baptist churches instead.


132 posted on 12/23/2005 2:13:33 PM PST by gondramB (Rightful liberty is unobstructed action within limits of the equal rights of others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gondramB

its a small number because its likely a cross referenced list - cross referenced with the list of US locations calling those foreign phone numbers the NSA intercepted.


133 posted on 12/23/2005 2:16:30 PM PST by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
Senior U.S. officials, including FBI Director Robert Mueller, have repeatedly said Islamic militants appeared intent on acquiring weapons of mass destruction for an attack against the United States.

Alas, we promote the ways of "Clinton and HalfBriight" and promote the loose lips of the media and accept the ways of the media in helping these Islamic fanatics via political directive.

What a way to win a war....

134 posted on 12/23/2005 2:16:39 PM PST by EGPWS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
Another monitoring job:

Spies in the Sky

135 posted on 12/23/2005 2:17:53 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach (History is soon Forgotten,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Dawggie

I don't beleive in the MSM belching the government line day in day out, but there must be some balance.

The problem with the media is that they think it's their job to be adversarial. In some instances it is. In many instances it is not.

The media has miserably failed it's duty to explain issues to the public. If the media was even close to center, it could easily report information in such a manner as to bolster certain 'givens' for public consumption. It has not and will not.

This is why the public is apathetic. That and the fact that the democrats with the help of the MSM, have thrown so much defication at the public, that the public is thoroughly confused at times.

Tired of infighting, they just tune out.

That's a sad state of affairs.


136 posted on 12/23/2005 2:20:20 PM PST by DoughtyOne (MSM: Public support for war waining. 403/3 House vote against pullout vaporizes another lie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

EXCLUSIVE: Nuclear Monitoring of Muslims Done Without Search Warrants
Posted 12/22/05
By David E. Kaplan

http://www.usnews.com/usnews/news/articles/nest/051222nest.htm


137 posted on 12/23/2005 2:21:26 PM PST by Vn_survivor_67-68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Raycpa; NormsRevenge; Grampa Dave; SierraWasp; Marine_Uncle; Mo1; Coop; Cap Huff; Dog
And I thought our government was not being serious enough about the threats, thank you George.

And thank this GUY:

A Junior Aide Had a Big Role in Terror Policy

138 posted on 12/23/2005 2:24:14 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach (History is soon Forgotten,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: oceanview
Kyllo was a 5-4 decision. Scalia happened to write the majority opinion. Rehnquist, O'Connor and Kennedy were three of the four dissenters.

A directed used of thermal imaging technology to look inside a home isn't the same thing as a non-directional Geiger count of the molecules outside a home. Marijuana plants don't kill people while sitting in the soil. High levels of radiation can. The governmental interest in detecting sources of radiation is much higher, whether the activity creating the radioactivity is legal or illegal. This is not the same case as Kyllo.
139 posted on 12/23/2005 2:25:12 PM PST by conservative in nyc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

The press CORPSES need to learn to Shut Up.


140 posted on 12/23/2005 2:26:52 PM PST by msnimje (Political Correctness -- An OFFENSIVE attempt not to offend.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 341-345 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson