Skip to comments.
US monitored Muslim sites for radiation: report
Yahoo ^
| 12/23/05
Posted on 12/23/2005 12:00:17 PM PST by Sub-Driver
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140 ... 341-345 next last
To: Darkwolf377
The more of this stuff the MSM reveal, the more Americans are in danger.
To: MikeinIraq
no, not the "entire" agency - but there are plenty of people in those agencies like that.
To: Sub-Driver
Aren't gieger counters detecting molecules that would be off the property?
103
posted on
12/23/2005 1:36:45 PM PST
by
Raycpa
To: Sub-Driver
This is such great news. Thank You President Bush for making really smart decisions on our behalf. ;o)
104
posted on
12/23/2005 1:38:03 PM PST
by
shield
(The fear of the LORD is the beginning of knowledge: but fools despise wisdom and instructions.Pr 1:7)
To: oceanview
my guess is probably 1 or 2 per 1000 or so, just from my observations.....
105
posted on
12/23/2005 1:38:12 PM PST
by
MikefromOhio
(It's amazing that a guy says he wants to nuke parts of America ON FR, but he doesn't get zotted)
To: Sub-Driver
US monitor
eds Muslim sites for radiation: report
There, fixed it. (I hope)
106
posted on
12/23/2005 1:38:21 PM PST
by
the anti-liberal
(Hey, Al Qaeda: Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent)
To: Sub-Driver
Another Top Secret program revealed... Never forget: to Dems and their ilk, nothing is sacred. Look how they treat babies!
Have you Thanked a Soldier today?
Thank a Soldier Week is December 19th to December 25th!
107
posted on
12/23/2005 1:38:35 PM PST
by
cgk
(I don't see myself as a conservative. I see myself as a religious, right-wing, wacko extremist.)
To: Sub-Driver
U.S. officials have secretly monitored radiation levels at Muslim sites, including mosques and private homes, since September 11, 2001 as part of a top secret program searching for nuclear bombs, U.S. News and World Report said on Friday. Uhh, I guess it's not top secret anymore. What is the "tipping point" of leaking secret information? Would the NYT publish ICBM launch codes if they were leaked to them?
To: Raycpa
if you read post 88, apparently even thermal imaging of any law enforcement person using their sense of smell - is also unconstitutional.
I hate to say this - but I bet the FBI suspends this program now that it has been "outed". the muslims and the ACLU are going to go into court over this.
To: Sols
A geiger counter doesn't obtain information about the interior of a home. It obtains information about the air immediately adjacent to the home. You can't find out what's going on inside merely by checking radiation levels. The only thing you can find out is that there is an abnormally high level of radiation near that location. An infrared scanner is much different in that respect.
To: Bryan24
It's time to round up the traitors........
111
posted on
12/23/2005 1:40:38 PM PST
by
shield
(The fear of the LORD is the beginning of knowledge: but fools despise wisdom and instructions.Pr 1:7)
To: Sub-Driver
I'm ready to see someone do hard time for crap like this. I am absolutely sick and tired of the MSM placing national security - and by translation, the security provided to myself and my family - behind selling magazines and newspapers and attracting viewers.
It needs to STOP. NOW.
112
posted on
12/23/2005 1:41:30 PM PST
by
Colonel_Flagg
("Defeatism may have its partisan uses but it is not justified by the facts.")
To: Sub-Driver
well, it ain't no secret now
113
posted on
12/23/2005 1:42:09 PM PST
by
sure_fine
(*not one to over kill the thought process*)
To: conservative in nyc
while I agree with you, I am not so sure the SCOTUS would. when you've got Scalia joining that kind of decision.
To: Sub-Driver
115
posted on
12/23/2005 1:43:40 PM PST
by
Unicorn
(Too many wimps around.)
To: oceanview
Thermal imaging is measuring heat on the property. A geiger counter would be measuring molcules off the property.
116
posted on
12/23/2005 1:44:02 PM PST
by
Raycpa
To: Colonel_Flagg
anyone smell rocketfeller, turbin durbin, or the mother of all murthas?
117
posted on
12/23/2005 1:45:44 PM PST
by
sure_fine
(*not one to over kill the thought process*)
To: nuffsenuff
I want to know how Rockefeller was able to go to Syria and warn them about the war. What else did he tell them, other than get Saddam's WMD over here now?
118
posted on
12/23/2005 1:47:04 PM PST
by
lizma
To: Darkwolf377
I agree............I think the Democrats assume their entire base is rabidly liberal and cares nothing about their own security. The more the American people hear about Bush using the NSA and seek and peek type stuff against muslims, the more they will approve. At the end of the day, most people like the idea that the Government is doing more than the Clntoon administration was.
To: Raycpa
I know. all I am saying is, if the decision in post 88 is broad enough - it would say that any detection that can determine the contents of a home, is a warrantless search. this apparantly would also mean that if the police smell or hear something outside a home - that somehow that is a "search" of that home? if the police smell certain meth lab chemicals outside a home, does that consitute a warrantless search?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140 ... 341-345 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson