Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: West Coast Conservative

So, what Tiny Tommy is claiming is that the Dims thought this whole thing through, and purposely, intentionally decided that the Commander in Chief should not have the power to protect Americans from terrorists and terrorist sympathizers entrenched inside the USA?

Please let that be what he's saying. If so, the Republicans will gain super-majority status in short order.


53 posted on 12/23/2005 7:23:45 AM PST by savedbygrace (SECURE THE BORDERS FIRST (I'M YELLING ON PURPOSE))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: savedbygrace
That was a calculated attempt to make the President liable for any further acts of terrorism.
Ann said it best:

Any CIC who DID NOT do anything and everything, including eavesdropping on phone calls, would have been impeached for derliction of duty.
The dims have a sutble way of making everything a double-edge..Ignore their vote, and he's a villian out to strip every Constitutional protection ever written.
These a$$holes are out to get the President, and they will sacrifice our security to do it.
They will get everyone of us killed before this is over.

58 posted on 12/23/2005 7:40:01 AM PST by concretebob (We should give anarchists what they want. Then we can kill them and not worry about jailtime.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

To: savedbygrace
I screwed up an html tag..repost

That was a calculated attempt to make the President liable for any further acts of terrorism.
Ann said it best:

Any CIC who DID NOT do anything and everything, including eavesdropping on phone calls, would have been impeached for derliction of duty.

The dims have a sutble way of making everything a double-edge..
They don't give the CIC the powers he needs, but if he abides by their vote, he's failed to keep Americans safe.
Ignore their vote, and he's a villian out to strip every Constitutional protection ever written.
These a$$holes are out to get the President, and they will sacrifice our security to do it.
They will get everyone of us killed before this is over.

59 posted on 12/23/2005 7:42:40 AM PST by concretebob (We should give anarchists what they want. Then we can kill them and not worry about jailtime.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

To: savedbygrace

Amazing, isn't it. Little Tommy is telling us that just days after we suffered the worst attack on American soil that he didn't want to give the President the power to monitor enemies within this country. This despite the fact that the 9/11 attack was carried out by terrorists within this country, using our own resources.

Yet, even with this admission I don't recall ANY objection by these same liberals when the president started shutting down US-based Islamic charities, which obviously required some kind of domestic surveillance to gather evidence of their collaboration with our enemies. These people are the biggest, most dangerous frauds I've ever seen.


64 posted on 12/23/2005 9:37:31 AM PST by cwb (Liberalism is the opiate of the *asses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson