Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jess35
Just admit that you want to take science, completely destroy the traditional purpose and meaning and use it as a tool for proselytizing.

No one has a monolpoly on science or it's definition. The common definition is simply "the observation, identification, description, experimental investigation, and theoretical explanation of phenomena." If anyone is interested in re-defining science, it is those who would divorce it from the notion of intelligent design. Who would do a thing like that without saying so up front? Who is it that is attempting to establish atheistic science in public schools without calling it "atheistic?"

168 posted on 12/23/2005 12:04:39 PM PST by Fester Chugabrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies ]


To: Fester Chugabrew
No one has a monolpoly on science or it's definition.

Nor does anyone have a monopoly on Christianity or it's definition. How would you like the athiests whom you seem to think are hiding in your closet and under you bed like the boogeyman to be the appointed group that tells the world what Christianity means, represents and holds for the future. Episcopalians in this nation have gotten a small taste of that...how'd ya like it on a grand scale?

199 posted on 12/23/2005 10:09:00 PM PST by jess35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson