What part of post 140 did you not understand? If it is the intent of certain people, either directly or by stealth, to "replace" atheistic science in public schools, then I disagree with them. If it is their intent to establish theistic science as a viable means of explaining the universe, then I not only support them, but also recognize it is within their rights under the Constitution to do so.
It should hardly be necessary to couch these intentions in subterfuge or false testimony. The fact of general agreement with religion and the idea of intelligent design has no bearing on the reasonable notion that matter does not typically organize itself, or that the presence of organized matter that behaves according to predictable laws can reasonably be explained in general terms as "God's work."
ID isn't a constitutional right.
Some of you really need to dust off the Constitution and give it a read. Stop depending on the likes of David Barton to tell you what it says.