Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RightWhale
Port Authority also has a non-viable proposal according to BP and Exxon.

Why is it nonviable in their opinion?

23 posted on 12/22/2005 2:20:42 PM PST by MeneMeneTekelUpharsin (Freedom is the freedom to discipline yourself so others don't have to do it for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin

The third proposal, Calpine, has already gone down in flames. The Port Authority proposal is non-viable because it is not competitive with the Alaska Highway route due to adding the extra steps of liquifying and putting the product on tankers only to offload and put in the Canada pipeline anyway. Besides, Port Authority lacks the financial depth of pocket to construct the project.


24 posted on 12/22/2005 2:24:08 PM PST by RightWhale (pas de lieu, Rhone que nous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson