Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin

The third proposal, Calpine, has already gone down in flames. The Port Authority proposal is non-viable because it is not competitive with the Alaska Highway route due to adding the extra steps of liquifying and putting the product on tankers only to offload and put in the Canada pipeline anyway. Besides, Port Authority lacks the financial depth of pocket to construct the project.


24 posted on 12/22/2005 2:24:08 PM PST by RightWhale (pas de lieu, Rhone que nous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]


To: RightWhale

I can see that -- most public entities do not have enough funds to properly invest in anything. However, that doesn't seem to stop them from trying, does it?


25 posted on 12/22/2005 2:25:41 PM PST by MeneMeneTekelUpharsin (Freedom is the freedom to discipline yourself so others don't have to do it for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: RightWhale
From the article..... Seems the State is trying to finalize the project and these investors are being shut out thus the lawsuit.....
Gov. Frank Murkowski has halted negotiations with the port authority and is focused solely on closing a deal with the three oil companies for their $20 billion (euro16.7 billion) pipeline proposal. Murkowski spokeswoman Becky Hultberg said the governor's office has not seen the lawsuit and could not comment.

31 posted on 12/22/2005 4:28:38 PM PST by deport (Merry Christmas; Feliz Navidad; Buon Natale; Joyeux Noël to one and all and Happy Holidays to.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson