Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ovrtaxt

This sort of reminds me of the Germans' "Tiger Tank" and the Sherman M-4. The Germans had the best, bar none tank in the world..firepower, armor....that could cut a swath through the enemy easily....What they did not expect, though, was the NUMBER of Sherman M-4s that the US could produce, nor the number of T-39s that the Russians could produce. What they lacked in armor and firepower, they made up with speed and numbers, pure and simple.

The Raptor IS probably the best, but we don't have enough and can't afford what we'll need....


41 posted on 12/22/2005 5:42:15 AM PST by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: Gaffer

The "Tiger Tank" analogy is not a good one. The Tiger had a major defect: it wasn't mechanically reliable. It was best used on the defensive as a kind of Tank Destroyer. Out in open country it was slow and suseptible to breakdowns. Not a very good offensive tank.

One of the features of these modern aircraft is the lower maintenance hours per flight hour. The "Up Time" on these planes is going to be one of their strongest features.


58 posted on 12/22/2005 7:49:29 AM PST by Tallguy (When it's a bet between reality and delusion, bet on reality -- Mark Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson