Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The “Ultimate Betrayal”? - Humvee realities.
NRO ^ | December 21, 2005 | W. Thomas Smith Jr.

Posted on 12/22/2005 12:57:29 AM PST by neverdem

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last

1 posted on 12/22/2005 12:57:31 AM PST by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: neverdem
"THE ROCK" (IED-proof APC?) SURVIVES IED BLAST


2 posted on 12/22/2005 1:13:39 AM PST by Anti-Bubba182
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #3 Removed by Moderator

To: Anti-Bubba182
The wheels are too small on that. It would work only on a paved road. The army needs something more like this:


4 posted on 12/22/2005 1:17:46 AM PST by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Scottyboy568

Hmmm....since the marines have no active para units except force and radio recon guys I dunno if the guy was in force.

He probably just went to jump school and said he was a paratrooper, though never on jump status.


5 posted on 12/22/2005 1:21:11 AM PST by Liberfighter (The NSA- The Ultimate Google)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: FreedomCalls

I think they want something more than a HUMMER and less than a striker. As far as the off road quality, I believe most, if not all, IED casualties were on roads.


6 posted on 12/22/2005 1:22:17 AM PST by Anti-Bubba182
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Scottyboy568
You're right about no 'paras' being in the Marines, at least not in the Army sense of the word.

You're either jump qualified or your not and there are no specialized 'paratroop' units in the Corps.

L

7 posted on 12/22/2005 1:25:28 AM PST by Lurker (And everyday the paperboy brings more...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: FreedomCalls
The army needs something more like this:

How does the Italian Army fair with IEDs?

8 posted on 12/22/2005 1:31:57 AM PST by adamsjas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Lurker

The Dems complain about combat vehicle deficiencies, but when in power, gut the military budget needed for correcting said deficiencies (ala Clinton, ala Carter).

In the Carter era, we were reduced to buying commercial (civilian) pickup trucks and just painting them O.D.

Ok for State side duty, but for combat????


9 posted on 12/22/2005 1:33:56 AM PST by OldArmy52 (Terrorism...the action arm of the DNC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: OldArmy52
I was in the Corps just after Reagan was elected. I remember taking marksmanship training with M-14s because there weren't enough 16s to go around.

No that I found that to be a bad thing, I loved that 14.

But, I remember seeing lots of beat to crap Suburbans around Pendleton and we were issued what must have been WWII vintage 1911s.

L

10 posted on 12/22/2005 1:38:28 AM PST by Lurker (And everyday the paperboy brings more...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE; PoorMuttly; El Gato; JudyB1938; Ernest_at_the_Beach; lepton; LadyDoc; jb6; ...
U.S. Troops Want a Better Bullet Comment 45 has an assessment of Iraq and the weaponry used there. Comment 91 has the best description of terminal ballistics in 5.56 mm rounds that I've seen.

From time to time, I’ll ping on noteworthy articles about politics, foreign and military affairs. FReepmail me if you want on or off my list.

11 posted on 12/22/2005 1:43:30 AM PST by neverdem (May you be in heaven a half hour before the devil knows that you're dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreedomCalls
I like NASCAR's contribution in design...



12 posted on 12/22/2005 1:51:43 AM PST by kingu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Scottyboy568
By the way, I couldn't help noticing the author's tagline - there is no such thing as a U.S. Marine paratrooper.

That's just because Marines don't need parachutes.

13 posted on 12/22/2005 2:00:04 AM PST by Caipirabob (Democrats.. Socialists..Commies..Traitors...Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Dingo - All Protected Vehicle

14 posted on 12/22/2005 2:13:37 AM PST by sumocide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreedomCalls

Kinda like this?
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/6/6b/Stryker-IFV-50cal.jpg


15 posted on 12/22/2005 2:18:50 AM PST by raynearhood ("America is too great for small dreams." - Ronald Reagan, speech to Congress. January 1, 1984.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Why is it taking so long to design, develop, produce, and deploy — in adequate numbers — a troop-transporting armored vehicle that would replace the up-armored Humvee in Iraq? I've been asked that question time and again, not by soldiers and Marines who ride in Humvees daily, but by fellow journalists, many of whom have logged time in Iraq or Afghanistan.

Note who's asking the question, first off (hint - reporters). I've got your answer. You're a dope reporter who can't even spell engineering, much less understand the requirements of weight, fuel efficiency, load capacity, serviceability, etc. That stuff takes time to get right, and guess who'll be the first critic in line if anyone of those and several critical factors in vehicle design are omitted or shirked.

That said, I think the telling point here again is, who's asking the question? It's not the military.

16 posted on 12/22/2005 3:34:13 AM PST by Hardastarboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Other problems would be cost performance, and mass productivity. It could be very challenging with a limited military budget to afford costly heavy armored vehicles for every soldier, just like all the fuss about F-22A Raptor for its price. If the cost goes high, I would expects the Dems would slam on this creating more headaches. Well, they were a headache in the first place anyways.


17 posted on 12/22/2005 3:38:47 AM PST by Wiz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

I strongly recommend M1117 ASV-150 as the next generation of Hummers under new threats, with configurations for multi-purpose role. It's cost performance is good enough to handle certain tactics of guerilla warfare, and be produced in mass. It's more expensive than M1114, but much cheaper than Strykers.


18 posted on 12/22/2005 3:42:06 AM PST by Wiz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
The HUMVEE was produced to replace the jeep and the weapons carrier (3/4 ton truck).

Compared to those two vehicles the stock HUMVEE was an order of magnitude improvement. It was never designed or intended to be an armored vehicle, although it did have some bullet resistant properties..

As Rumsfeld has said, "you go to war with the army you have, not the one you wish you had.
19 posted on 12/22/2005 3:45:41 AM PST by Beckwith (The liberal press has picked sides ... and they have sided with the Islamofascists)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Posted yesterday.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1544593/posts


20 posted on 12/22/2005 4:30:46 AM PST by Ninian Dryhope ("Bush lied, people dyed. Their fingers." The inestimable Mark Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson