Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ndt
Only that in the cases that involve U.S. citizens, we need to follow the Constitution and rule of law.

I'd agree with that except that Taliban Johnny forfeited that protection when he took up arms against the US. I'd take it one step further, anybody forfeits those rights when they collaborate with the terrorists

118 posted on 12/21/2005 6:08:14 PM PST by Sir_Humphrey (The mighty oak is just a nut who held it's ground)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies ]


To: Sir_Humphrey

indeed, look at the warrantless search of Aldrich Ames home conducted under Clinton. once the citizen has essentally become an agent of a foreign power, the game changes. I saw no uproar over Aldrich Ames rights being violated.


121 posted on 12/21/2005 6:10:40 PM PST by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies ]

To: Sir_Humphrey
"I'd agree with that except that Taliban Johnny forfeited that protection "

I would agree with you in that case. He was caught on foreign soil with a foreign "military".
131 posted on 12/21/2005 6:21:14 PM PST by ndt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies ]

To: Sir_Humphrey
"I'd agree with that except that Taliban Johnny forfeited that protection when he took up arms against the US."

And yet he received counsel, a speedy civilian trial (which was averted via plea bargain), and a regular prison sentence.
205 posted on 12/22/2005 1:42:17 AM PST by NJ_gent (Modernman should not have been banned.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson