Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Headed for the SCOTUS no doubt!
1 posted on 12/21/2005 2:06:49 PM PST by AntiGuv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: AntiGuv

this case is out of control now - I think I understand what the administation is doing - delaying the inevitable, the inevitable being that Padilla will be granted a full US civil trial which the government will not be able to win.

in the end, Padilla will walk.


2 posted on 12/21/2005 2:09:00 PM PST by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AntiGuv

This is quite possibly the most inchorent article by the AP I have ever read. Either that or someone in the Justice Department has gone stark raving mad. Good for Judge Lutting.


3 posted on 12/21/2005 2:09:47 PM PST by MNJohnnie (We do not create terrorism by fighting the terrorists. We invite terrorism by ignoring them.--GWBush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AntiGuv
WASHINGTON - In a sharp rebuke, a federal appeals court denied Wednesday a Bush administration request to transfer terrorism suspect Jose Padilla from military to civilian law enforcement custody.

The three-judge panel of the Richmond-based 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals also refused the administration's request to vacate a September ruling that gave President Bush wide authority to detain "enemy combatants" indefinitely without charges on U.S. soil.

OK, I'm officially confused. The Bush administration is seeking to have a favorable ruling, recognizing its authority to detain enemy combatants, vacated??? ...and to have Padilla put in civil custody instead of military???

I don't get it...

4 posted on 12/21/2005 2:10:27 PM PST by TChris ("Unless you act, you're going to lose your world." - Mark Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AntiGuv

Just shoot him while trying to escape or have a suicide in his cell. Problem solved.


11 posted on 12/21/2005 2:31:15 PM PST by sgtbono2002
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All
Padilla v. Hanft, No. 05-6396 ...
http://pacer.ca4.uscourts.gov/opinion.pdf/056396R1.P.pdf

Published order denying motion for authorization to transfer petitioner from military custody

14 posted on 12/21/2005 2:48:19 PM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AntiGuv

Looks like Luttig is not too happy with Bush for being overlooked for SCOTUS.


18 posted on 12/21/2005 2:57:32 PM PST by double_down
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AntiGuv

Time for Padilla to have an "accident".


20 posted on 12/21/2005 3:13:12 PM PST by Excuse_My_Bellicosity ("Sharpei diem - Seize the wrinkled dog.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AntiGuv
"In a sharp rebuke"

... to the Supremne Court!

I feel very safe in saying that he wants this important issue decided- one way or the other. He would probably support the administration from his remarks on Hamdi (like any constitutionalist would LOL!). But whatever the outcome he feels all the branches of the government need their feet held to the fire- and he's just the man to do it, bless him.

...and that no one should mess around with the Fourth District.

25 posted on 12/21/2005 3:25:42 PM PST by mrsmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AntiGuv

Good on Luttig.


28 posted on 12/21/2005 3:35:48 PM PST by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AntiGuv

IMHO, if you catch an American as a terrorist, just shoot him. Do NOT take him prisoner, just shoot. I trust our military FAR more than I'd ever trust our court system.


47 posted on 12/21/2005 4:06:11 PM PST by McGavin999 (If Intelligence Agencies can't find leakers, how can we expect them to find terrorists?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AntiGuv

And Luttig is so much better than Harriette Myers. /sarcasm

Padilla's a flipping traitor, and his name when he fought against his own nation was Abdullah al-Muhajir.

Wonder why Luttig can't see through this Padilla crap?


132 posted on 12/21/2005 6:21:44 PM PST by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AntiGuv
There have been ties of gangs getting terrorists into the country as go-betweens. Could have been like that and I hear that Mexican gangs are trying to get terrorists into the USA for the $$$$$$$$$$$$$$ as well.

Don't know if it was to blow up some building, that could be, or could not be. Same for my possibility as well.
155 posted on 12/21/2005 6:51:10 PM PST by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AntiGuv

Leave him in military custody. Send him to Abu Grahib.


175 posted on 12/21/2005 7:37:44 PM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AntiGuv

Wow, is this ever confusing.


209 posted on 12/22/2005 1:55:33 AM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AntiGuv

PADILLA V. HANFT
December 21, 2005

A federal appeals court denies the government's request to transfer American terror suspect Jose Padilla from military custody to civilian custody, concluding that by doing so "the government may be attempting to avoid consideration of our decision by the Supreme Court, and also because we believe that this case presents an issue of such special national importance as to warrant final consideration by that court."

http://news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/padilla/padhanft122105ord.pdf

Pres. Bush's Memo on Transferring Padilla
http://public.findlaw.com/pnews/news/hdocs/docs/padilla/gwb112005memo.html

See the Padilla Terror Case History
http://news.lp.findlaw.com/legalnews/us/terrorism/cases/index.html#padilla

U.S. Attorney General Alberto Gonzales
http://pview.findlaw.com/view/1505800_1

Padilla's Defense Attorney Andrew Patel
http://pview.findlaw.com/view/1200006_1

Padilla's Defense Attorney Donna Newman
http://pview.findlaw.com/view/2946081_1

FindLaw's Supreme Court Center
http://supreme.lp.findlaw.com/


257 posted on 12/22/2005 10:55:16 AM PST by OXENinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AntiGuv

Was Padilla a US Citizen?


258 posted on 12/22/2005 10:58:06 AM PST by Leatherneck_MT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AntiGuv

All the little Nancy boys on the Fourth are upset that after three--errr--two picks by Bush for the High Court they've yet to make a showin'


267 posted on 12/22/2005 7:01:12 PM PST by Natchez Hawk (What's so funny about the first, second, and fourth Amendments?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AntiGuv

FoxNews reports that SCOTUS has permitted the transfer to civilian court, requested by the administration.


279 posted on 01/04/2006 1:26:18 PM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson