Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

It's God or Darwin
National Review Online ^ | 12/21/'05 | David Klinghoffer

Posted on 12/21/2005 2:06:09 PM PST by Zionist Conspirator

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 161-165 next last
To: darbymcgill
"Granted, but there are "sciences" that do."

"And should those SWAGs be allowed in science class and text books?"

To the extent that it's well supported scientifically (ie. it's not a SWAG). I just want solid scientific evidence for things that are taught in science class. Until ID produces solid scientific evidence it doesn't belong there.
81 posted on 12/21/2005 8:24:57 PM PST by 21stCenturyFreeThinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: July4th64

The Bible doesn't mention any phenomenon that could be explained by a solar eclipse. A darkness lasting three hours does not fit an eclipse, and a solar eclipse cannot occur near a full moon.

There was a solar eclipse in 29 A.D., but it would not have been total in the vicinity of Israel.


82 posted on 12/21/2005 8:27:41 PM PST by js1138 (Great is the power of steady misrepresentation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: H. Paul Pressler IV
I would think that NRO would have mentioned it if Jones had been a Bush Appointee.

Ain't creationists great? As always, the author of the article didn't mention he's part of the Discovery Institute gang. He forgot to mention the judge's resume. In other words, he's obfuscated the truth yet again, like all creationists do. I'm loving every second of this thread.
83 posted on 12/21/2005 8:35:08 PM PST by whattajoke (I'm back... kinda.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Zionist Conspirator

Y*u sure do type f*nny.


84 posted on 12/21/2005 8:38:10 PM PST by whattajoke (I'm back... kinda.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Zionist Conspirator

I do not have time to read the entire article, but I did read some of the words of the Judge involved in this case.

That judge is a complete hypocrite, and he is certainly not an example of what objectivity is, by his words.


85 posted on 12/21/2005 8:38:39 PM PST by Radix (Senator Kennedy actually criticized the President for thinking that he is above the Law!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Doc Savage
Bring evolution down to a molecular level and it falls apart. Randomness. Exactly how do you get from A-1 to Z-2000 through random events? The downfall of Darwinism.

I suppose it would be if evolution stated any such thing. DING DING DING, the 1 millionth "end of evolution" claim! Do we (Darwin Central) have a prize?
86 posted on 12/21/2005 8:40:54 PM PST by whattajoke (I'm back... kinda.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: timor_noctis
I am not an expert on Darwin, but I have read Origin of a Species and Journey of the HMS Beagle. I also have taken a few courses in systematics and classification. I do not know anything about you since you give no info on your page. I am not trying to draw a parallel between Darwin an socialistic principles. I was only trying to debunk some leftist arguments in favor of Darwin. IMHO this is too complex a topic to debate in 5 to 10 sentence rebuttals. At this point I regret ever getting involved with this thread.

P.S. Do I love my niece, or am I only encouraging her survival because she carries approximately 25% of my genes?
Hell, what about my own kids? Food for too much thought.
87 posted on 12/21/2005 8:41:26 PM PST by aliquando (A Scout is T, L, H, F, C, K, O, C, T, B, C, and R.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: July4th64
Intelligent Design, creationisim or whatever, is another theory

WRONG WRONG WRONG WRONG WRONG WRONG. Sheesh, do ou people EVER learn ANYTHING?
88 posted on 12/21/2005 8:42:10 PM PST by whattajoke (I'm back... kinda.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Zionist Conspirator

Why is Darwinism considered science? It's pure guesswork.


89 posted on 12/21/2005 8:44:28 PM PST by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aliquando

"BTW, Charles' father was an Anglican minister."

His father was a doctor, not a minister.
http://darwin.baruch.cuny.edu/biography/shrewsbury/rdarwin.html

"Darwin was also a religious man."

Early in life, yes; he died an agnostic though.

Merry Christmas!! :)


90 posted on 12/21/2005 9:53:44 PM PST by CarolinaGuitarman ("There is a grandeur in this view of life...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Zionist Conspirator

later read/pingout.


91 posted on 12/21/2005 10:19:20 PM PST by little jeremiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: whattajoke
Ain't creationists great? As always, the author of the article didn't mention he's part of the Discovery Institute gang. He forgot to mention the judge's resume. In other words, he's obfuscated the truth yet again, like all creationists do. I'm loving every second of this thread.

I am sure more people would be enjoying this thread if the judge in question had been appointed by a certain former president.

92 posted on 12/21/2005 11:12:35 PM PST by H. Paul Pressler IV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: July4th64
Evolution is a theory

Gravity is also a theory but I would not bet that gravity does not exist.

93 posted on 12/21/2005 11:15:12 PM PST by H. Paul Pressler IV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: GSHastings
"Evolution does not explain Creation" - Charles Darwin

"Evolution does not explain the diversity and complexity of life on Earthcite>" - me

"ID does not explain anything" - me, too
94 posted on 12/22/2005 4:21:38 AM PST by MHalblaub (Tell me in four more years (No, I did not vote for Kerry))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: whattajoke
Do we (Darwin Central) have a prize?

No prize. We let nature take its course.

"Stupidity cannot be cured with money, or through education, or by legislation. Stupidity is not a sin, the victim can't help being stupid. But stupidity is the only universal capital crime; the sentence is death, there is no appeal, and execution is carried out automatically and without pity."
-- Robert Heinlein

95 posted on 12/22/2005 6:08:21 AM PST by PatrickHenry (... endless horde of misguided Luddites ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: Zionist Conspirator

Freedom of religion is not freedom from religion.

Don't allow Atheism to become the state religion (and it is a faith, it asserts that there absolutely is no god).


96 posted on 12/22/2005 6:52:10 AM PST by weegee (Christmas - the holiday that dare not speak its name.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EdJay

We have 3 models:
- God created the universe.
- The universe was created and God evolved along with it.
- God does not exist.

Many on the left are opposed to accepting that God "might" have created the universe. I've never heard anyone espouse the second model. That leave thoses who oppose the first model nowhere to go but with the third (no god) model.


97 posted on 12/22/2005 7:02:34 AM PST by weegee (Christmas - the holiday that dare not speak its name.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: The Ghost of FReepers Past; ohioWfan; Tribune7; Tolkien; GrandEagle; Right in Wisconsin; Dataman; ..
ping


Revelation 4:11Intelligent Design
See my profile for info

98 posted on 12/22/2005 7:08:40 AM PST by wallcrawlr (Pray for the troops [all the troops here and abroad]: Success....and nothing less!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DeweyCA

Atheism is a religion because it claims to have the answers, that it is an absolute belief that there is no god.

Agnostism is accepting of religion in that agnostics admit they "don't know" if God exists or is He does, what the nature of that God is.

I don't accept the argument that they push for a secular (non-religious) society, they push for an Atheist society. Their no god God should not be institutionalized and forced down the throats of the citizens.


99 posted on 12/22/2005 7:09:03 AM PST by weegee (Christmas - the holiday that dare not speak its name.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Zionist Conspirator
"Safety demands that religion be put in cages," explains Dennett, "when absolutely necessary....The message is clear: those who will not accommodate, who will not temper, who insist on keeping only the purest and wildest strains of their heritage alive, we will be obliged, reluctantly, to cage or disarm, and we will do our best to disable the memes they fight for."

Safety??? Who's safety? His? Is Dennett so delusional that he thinks the Christians are coming after him? Or are joined in a cabal to suspend the Constitution and impose a theocracy? Jeepers, such hysterics....

What a blithering idiot Dennett is.... One gathers he would not be reluctant to use coercion and force so that his "pristine opinion," his superior "meme," can prevail in the marketplace of ideas. I wonder how many people appreciate the closet fascism that lies at the bottom of such statements.

Sigh....

Thanks for the post, Zionist Conspirator!

100 posted on 12/22/2005 10:41:43 AM PST by betty boop (Dominus illuminatio mea.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 161-165 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson