I don't understand why he won't mention any of the things I have read about, and why the DOD won't release docsa to Stephen Hayes, docs with titles such as: "IIS (Iraqi Intel Service) Correspondance for the Iraqi Embassy in the Phillipines and Iraqi MFA (Ministry of Foreign Affairs)" Summary full reports on connections between Abu Sayef and the Qadafi Charity Establishment and on certain individuals travelling to Pakistan and involvements with bin Laden"
Especially since Qadafi paid $25 mill to Abu Sayef in the summer of 2000, to secure the release of 25 western hostages.
This is still my theory:
Axis of Evil were pooling resources, so noone would have all the pieces, and were actually building nuclear weapons (and other WMD) in Libya.
I think Bush Admin knows things we don't (imagine that) and for some reason they won't come out and tell the whole story.
Maybe following leads to see where they lead?
Probably the big red "TOP SECRET" stamped on the front. I'm OK with secrets in the interest of national security, but when the information (like WMDs found in Iraq) is publicly available I would think you would every once in a while mention it.
All the same, I'm glad he's out there and taking a stand. His radio address Saturday was especially gratifying. He said it straight that the person(s) who leaked the info on the wiretapping have endangered national security. "Yesterday the existence of this secret program was revealed in media reports, after being improperly provided to news organizations. As a result, our enemies have learned information they should not have, and the unauthorized disclosure of this effort damages our national security and puts our citizens at risk. Revealing classified information is illegal, alerts our enemies, and endangers our country." Now I just want to see someone get locked up.