Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Does the US face an engineering gap?
The Christian Science Monitor ^ | December 20, 2005 | Mark Clayton

Posted on 12/20/2005 2:01:37 PM PST by Sonny M

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-100 next last
To: moog

That is fantastic. Keep the faith. I am not so worried about the quality of our college graduates, but of the education of the high school kids. Start them right early, yours is a precious position. Got to go now, my son is home, he just graduated. Early. Maybe I can pick up a pool game.

Metanoia is Greek for the ultimate eureka, a change of heart that results in a change of life. The vast majority of the word translated in the NT for repentence is metanoia, not metamelomae, for recognize the wrong and turn away.


41 posted on 12/20/2005 4:28:28 PM PST by BuglerTex (Metanoia,mostly, not metamelomae (sp?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: BuglerTex
That is fantastic. Keep the faith. I am not so worried about the quality of our college graduates, but of the education of the high school kids. Start them right early, yours is a precious position.

I take that responsibility most seriously.

42 posted on 12/20/2005 4:32:28 PM PST by moog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Sonny M

I.E. a engineering degree in china or india is more likely less then the US standard, and that would mean that india and chinas numbers are inflated, more over, that the idea of a big gap is a myth being perpetuated.

Agreed. I've come across many of these so-called engineers from India, China, Romania, etc. and the quality of education is just not to our standard.
Most of these folks are engineering technicians (3-year program) not real engineers. A mickey mouse community college calibre program is just not good enough for American business.

A big pet peeve of licensed PE's are folks who claim they are engineers but lack the proper qualifications. Thankfully employers know the game. They might hire these technicians but they are not paid as well or obtain good positions.


43 posted on 12/20/2005 4:32:43 PM PST by rasblue (Everyone has their price)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: generally

>The big money is made by the MBA's who exploit the engineers >and the lawyers who sue them.

Which is my the engineer doing his MBA is so common its a cliche. An engineer with an MBA has much greater earnings potential than a person with an easier undergrad degree with an MBA.
Also, law schools love engineering grads.


44 posted on 12/20/2005 4:35:46 PM PST by rasblue (Everyone has their price)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Kjobs

Yeah. Actually, withdrawing from the UN Outer Space Treaty and letting private persons and corporations claim outer space bodies as collateral for the purpose of mining and development would do something astonishing for establishing our lead for all time.


45 posted on 12/20/2005 4:42:25 PM PST by RightWhale (pas de lieu, Rhone que nous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Paul Ross

On a different tack, there was an article (Forbes or Money) about 17-20 years ago about the "brain drain of America." I'd suggest that Americans do not become complacent in our studies, education, creativity, and drive. The Chinese and Indians seemingly work much harder than we do in the education sector... and the manufacturing sector. Albeit they are capturing market due to low labour rates. This too will change as these countries mature in a capitlistic, free-enterprise market. That is my prediction.


46 posted on 12/20/2005 5:07:37 PM PST by Cobra64
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Sonny M

There are different kinds of engineers. I was certified as a combat engineer after only twelve weeks of training in the Army, but it took me five years to earn an M.E.E. I suspect that some of those foreign "engineers" don't know Jack.


47 posted on 12/20/2005 5:24:05 PM PST by KarinG1 (Some of us are trying to engage in philosophical discourse. Please don't allow us to interrupt you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Small-L

When I was a senior in college, my alma mater's mechanical engineering department was offering undergrads with GPA as low as 2.8 a free ride on tuition plus a stipend - if they were US citizens. It turns out many of their research grants were for defense contractors and the US government, and they required graduate students with US citizenship.

Most undergrads were US citizens (those that weren't had permanent residence; no one in my class came here just to go to school). Virtually all our graduate students were from India, China, and Turkey. I have nothing against most of the foreign grad students. Two of the Indian grad students who I was friendly with are newly-minted professors at other universities and are pursuing citizenship. However that was the exception rather than the rule! Most of the foreign students were there on the dime of their government or wealthy family members, and planned to return to their country of origin.

I, like many of my classmates, elected to enter the workforce before starting graduate school. For US citizens there are no visa issues for employers to deal with. A number of my classmates work for various defense contractors on projects requiring security clearances. H1Bs won't cut it for those. ;-) Considering that I had a job offer a full 6 months before graduation, with an employer who pays every penny of my educational expenses, I had little motivation to spend another few years as a poor graduate student. It was far more appealing to enter the workforce knowing that within 4 years I'd have my master's degree anyways, would gain real world engineering experience, and would be earning a good salary in the meantime.

So I'd agree - to a large extent our universities are educating foreign graduate students in engineering because they usually are self-supporting and don't require funding from the university. It was only when my school needed US citizens that they started offering tuition plus stipend to the majority of American undergrads.


48 posted on 12/20/2005 5:49:25 PM PST by Rubber_Duckie_27
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Sonny M
.E. a engineering degree in china or india is more likely less then the US standard, and that would mean that india and chinas numbers are inflated, more over, that the idea of a big gap is a myth being perpetuated.

Ok, I'm an engineer with 18years under my belt. And I disagree with you, and this is why

1. Have you looked at what passes for education in US schools? We have College students who have never heard of Calculus; while both India and China do this in Jr. High School.
2. US schools can't bend over far enough for the LOSERS in life. We glady graduate students who cannot read, who perform at a 4th grade level in Math, and barely a 6th grade in Science.
3. Our Culture is one of immediate gratification. Discipline is non-existant. This is NOT true for the Chinese and Indians.
4. Schools in India and China are geared to the TOP achievers. If you can't keep up, you can die on the street or work in a factory. There is REAL INCENTIVE to learn, to grow and to better yourself. This concept is totally alien to today's student.

Now, why is this important? Well, for one thing; we are importing talent with no dedication to this country. Think of it as hiring mercinaries who are paid to learn our best technology. These 'mercinaries' have NO loyalty to this country, and will take their pay and their skills back home with them in just a few years. What a cheap way for a poor country to improve their labor force!! Go to America, they will train you, they will pay you more than you can make at home. And when you come 'home', you will use what you have learned in the USA to compete against the USA.

And finally, Engineering is very HARD. Math, physics, design, software ... it's one of the harder degrees you can earn. And for busting your butt, you do not have job security, you do not get high pay, and the requirements placed on you to graduate with the engineering degree are higher than in almost any other area of study. Why bother? A business degree is far easier, the pay and job security are comparable; why would one go into the technical field? The incentive is GONE.

49 posted on 12/20/2005 5:57:44 PM PST by Hodar (With Rights, come Responsibilities. Don't assume one, without assuming the other.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Hodar
"A business degree is far easier, the pay and job security are comparable; why would one go into the technical field?"

My daughter will graduate from Rice in the spring with a degree in Chemical Engineering. She already has a job offer with a salary and signing bonus much higher than what the business grads are going to get. And her company will pay her tuition to get her MBA or Master's degree. You are being illogical.
50 posted on 12/20/2005 6:26:35 PM PST by Ninian Dryhope ("Bush lied, people dyed. Their fingers." The inestimable Mark Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: rasblue
Germany and Japan are the opposite. Engineering and design are the elite jobs there and it shows. BMW and Sony anyone? Siemens and Matsushima? China and India also value design and engineering and it shows.

From SOCIAL STATUS point of view I agree with you that Engineers fair better in these countries. However Engineers in the US are still payed better than their counterpart in Germany and Japan, I know this since our company have branches in Japan and Western Europe, and our engineers in the US with make 25% to 30% more in salaries than our counterpart with same position in Western Europe and Japan. Also American Engineers have vastly more resources for R&D, and design than those in Western European and more than those Japan.

Of course it is not worth comparing our engineers salaries and access for R & D and design to those of China and India, it is a joke to do so, and that why every Chinese and Indian engineers ultimate dream is to come and work in the US.

51 posted on 12/20/2005 6:40:59 PM PST by jveritas (The Axis of Defeatism: Left wing liberals, Buchananites, and third party voters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: rasblue
"American society values occupations that manage and redistribute wealth but not those who create wealth. Lawyers, and brokers are deitified......"

The U.S. has been using this approach for over 200 years (i.e. as the U.S. has expanded Westward and filled-out its territory), but in the long run it's not a model for survival.

In contrast, in China, each member of the Politburo Standing Committe is an Engineer or Scientist. The push for excellence in Science & Engineering comes from the top down.
52 posted on 12/20/2005 6:49:44 PM PST by indthkr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: jveritas
"and that why every Chinese and Indian engineers ultimate dream is to come and work in the US...."

Definitely not every Chinese or Indian engineer. Many of them can't wait to get back home to start companies. See thread:

Alarming Export: Engineers
53 posted on 12/20/2005 7:00:18 PM PST by indthkr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: indthkr
First of all it is not many, it few who return back willingly unless they do not find a job here in the first place then yes they have to go home. And those few who return home willingly will do so after they work here for many years to make some decent money and gain good experience and then go back home and open their own business.
54 posted on 12/20/2005 7:05:48 PM PST by jveritas (The Axis of Defeatism: Left wing liberals, Buchananites, and third party voters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: jveritas
"First of all it is not many......"

Well in one little survey (see the thread), the number returning home after a "few" years was about 65/70 highly trained engineers (~93%).

I've personally seen the same trends in my business.

Where do you get your data?
55 posted on 12/20/2005 7:24:07 PM PST by indthkr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: indthkr

From my business. Not a single Indian engineer we have have left. From the graduate engineering school I went to. All the foreign engineering students wanted to stay and work here. Most did not find a job so they were forced to go. Those who found a job are still working here.


56 posted on 12/20/2005 7:29:40 PM PST by jveritas (The Axis of Defeatism: Left wing liberals, Buchananites, and third party voters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: jveritas
"Not a single Indian engineer we have have left...."

Does this mean that everybody else left, or that you only hire people from India? What's your 5-year retention? 10-year?
57 posted on 12/20/2005 7:42:06 PM PST by indthkr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: indthkr
NO they want to work willingly and stay. They want to get their green card and stay working in the US.
58 posted on 12/20/2005 7:43:37 PM PST by jveritas (The Axis of Defeatism: Left wing liberals, Buchananites, and third party voters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Ninian Dryhope; Hodar
Hodar. "A business degree is far easier, the pay and job security are comparable; why would one go into the technical field?"

Ninian Dryhope. My daughter will graduate from Rice in the spring with a degree in Chemical Engineering. She already has a job offer with a salary and signing bonus much higher than what the business grads are going to get. And her company will pay her tuition to get her MBA or Master's degree. You are being illogical.

Hodar's observation about comparable pay seems on the money, IMHO. In Fortune 2000 companies newly hired technical employees may reach the company's nominal pay grade sooner, but in the end it seems that everyone regardless of background winds up with about the same pay, give or take a relatively minuscule incentive amount.

Your daughter may actually get promoted faster with an MBA because technical people tend to get stuck in various nooks and crannies of a company doing mission critical work. Meanwhile MBAs get promoted possibly because companies find it easier to find a another person to fill the recently promoted MBA's currently vacant nontechnical position.

Bottom line, if you become an engineer solely to try to make more money than others in a company you may end up stuck in a job that you hate.

IMHO of course. An opinion that when taken with 3 quarters may buy you a can of Coke. ;)
59 posted on 12/21/2005 7:56:42 AM PST by Milhous (Sarcasm - the last refuge of an empty mind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Sonny M

As someone who recruits engineers I can categorically state there is no lack of jobs for engineers in the US. Competition to recruit good engineers is fierce.


60 posted on 12/21/2005 8:00:25 AM PST by Casloy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-100 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson