Lots and lots of people are successful and probably make more money than you do, who do not understand evolutionary theory. Your post is humorous, but not very accurate.
The bottom line is judges should not be deciding what is taught in schools (and I would think this would be the conservative viewpoint). The local taxpayers should decide.
susie
And judges wouldnt be forced to if activists didnt try to redefine and dumbdown science by making the oral history of shepards the equivalent of the scientific method.
"The bottom line is judges should not be deciding what is taught in schools (and I would think this would be the conservative viewpoint). The local taxpayers should decide."
The judge isn't deciding what should be taught in the classroom--he's deciding what shouldn't. ID is for the simple-minded.
Funny, I thought someone using my nick and writing in a manner resembling me just said that taxpayers should decide what gets taught in schools. I just have a problem with teaching ID as science, cause it's not. Would you have a unit on the Declaration of Indpendence in your calculus class?
Wait, I forgot the cardinal rule. Facts don't work on people who reached their conclusion without considering the facts. So I won't bother.