And judges wouldnt be forced to if activists didnt try to redefine and dumbdown science by making the oral history of shepards the equivalent of the scientific method.
Again you prove your zero knowledge on the subject, because no ID books reference "the oral history of shepards" including the peer-reviewed ID book, "The Design Inference."
"But I thought there wasn't any peer-reviewed ID lit?"
Guess again.
You like this decision because you agree with the premise (ID is not science). However, do you believe judges should be deciding what is and isn't science??
susie
Well, it looks like evolutionists still have nothing to offer other than insults against what many hold dear. Methinks the reason for that is that any reasonable person can see that evolution is a joke.